View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
When soil water potential continued to decrease , no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.
SWP continued to be decreased e6 no longer obvious decrease e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Yield and Quality of Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52 e2 “the yield of two cultivars was decrease d significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558 e6 “but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no significant fruit yield decrease at final harvest.
O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage e0 no significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage, there was no significant decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–819 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Moderately conductive irrigation water caused no appreciable yield decrease .
water with moderate electrical conductivity e0 without an appreciable decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The cucumbers are irrigated with water with moderate electrical conductivity without an appreciable decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1346 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorsulfuron did not decrease mature grain nutrient concentrations or grain yield .
Chlorsulfuron treatment e0 nutrient concentrations in mature grain or grain yield e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Chlorsulfuron treatment did not decrease nutrient concentrations in mature grain or grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–734 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Bale storage did not decrease Cistus oil yield .
does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The storage of mechanically harvested Cistus ladanifer does not decrease the oil yield of steam distillation on a pilot scale. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1029 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit did not decrease maximum quantum yield of PSII.
maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “WD did not decrease the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1081 t0 “Styrax camporum
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–91 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
basal 25% defoliation e0 TDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed review summary no effect basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Increased IVDMD generally does not decrease forage yield .
increased IVDMD e6 no_change inferred e6 Verbatim
e6 “Because increased IVDMD generally does not decrease forage yield per se ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1278 t0 “Breeding for Increased Forage Nutritional Value ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–79 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
I. tinctoria showed no significant relative yield decrease despite the highest shoot Pb concentration.
relative yield decrease e0 no significant e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest shoot Pb concentration was in I. tinctoria having no significant relative yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1048 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Energy yield from gasification of switchgrass did not decrease on a unit biomass basis.
Energy yield from gasification e1 did not decrease on a unit biomass basis e1 Verbatim
t0 “Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 e1 “Energy yield from gasification did not decrease on a unit biomass basis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1100 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativat0
Solanum lycopersicum
Cucumis sativus
Triticum aestivum
Cistus ladanifer.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Vigna radiata
Isatis tinctoria
Panicum virgatum