Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein percentage did not decrease proportionally when grain yield per plant fell by 50% or more after defoliation at anthesis.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment: defoliation at anthesise1
Outcome: per cent grain proteine2
Direction: did not decrease proportionallye2
Qualifier: despite 50 % or more decrease in grain yield per plante2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“defoliation at anthesis in barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes grown under pot culture and non limiting nitrogen conditions”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–216

e2
“per cent grain protein did not decrease proportionally despite 50 % or more decrease in grain yield per plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–351

Title

Grain Protein Accumulation During Grain Development in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Raghuveer Polisetty; R. Chandra Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1989. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1989.tb00737.x

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A marginal increase in PPFD entailed a sharp decrease in the quantum yield of PS II (FPSII).

Taxon: Stellaria humifusaStellaria humifusae0
Treatment: a marginal increase in PPFDe7
Outcome: quantum yield of PS II (FPSII)e7
Direction: sharp decreasee7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“functional peculiarities of photosynthetic apparatus of Stellaria humifusa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–152

e7
“the sharp decrease in the quantum yield of PS II (FPSII) entailed by a marginal increase in PPFD”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–862

Title

Eco-physiological peculiarities of Stellaria humifusa in West Spitsbergen

Eugenia Fedorovna Markovskaya; Elena Valentinovna Novichonok; Natalya Yurievna Shmakova Czech Polar Reports 2019. doi:10.5817/cpr2019-2-13

Other claims from this paper (11)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low water stress can be allowed in wheat because it gives higher NUE with a non-significant decrease in yield.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: low water stress can be allowede3
Qualifier: non-significant decrease in yielde3

Verbatim

e3
“low water stress can be allowed which can result in higher NUE and non-significant decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–829

t0
“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–53

Title

Resource conservation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under different waterand nitrogen stress levels

Rajeev Ranjan; Usha Kiran Chopra; R. N. Sahoo; et al. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 2015

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Under low water level with no nitrogen stress, wheat yield decreased by only 5% compared with the highest yield.
Intervention effect Under low water level with no nitrogen stress, wheat NUE increased from 34 to 38%.
Association Lower water stress resulted in higher wheat NUE.
Association Higher water stress resulted in a decline in wheat NUE.
Association Yield and NUE of wheat were significantly affected by the different water and nitrogen levels.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

A 10 percent reduction in rainfall gave a small decrease in soybean yield under the climatic grid.

Taxon: Glycine maxGlycine maxe0
Treatment: 10 percent reduction in rainfalle1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: decreasee1
Qualifier: smalle1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32

e1
“The climatic grid of 10 percent reduction in rainfall from recent decade 1998-2008 showed small decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1887

Title

Modeling impacts and adaptations of climate change on soybean (Glycine max) production in Himachal Pradesh, India

RANBIR SINGH RANA; NAVELL CHANDER; ROHIT SHARMA; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2014. doi:10.56093/ijas.v84i10.44115

Other claims from this paper (12)

Method / resource The validated InfoCrop model had an RMSE of 8.8 days for days to maturity of soybean.
Method / resource The validated InfoCrop model had an RMSE of 190.4 kg/ha for soybean crop yield.
Intervention effect Elevated carbon dioxide at 50 and 100 ppm increased simulated soybean yield by 5.0 to 10.2 percent.
Intervention effect Projected yield losses from a 1 degree C temperature rise alone were 1.3 to 3.5 percent for soybean.
Intervention effect Projected yield losses from a 2 degree C temperature rise alone were 4.5 to 6.0 percent for soybean.
Intervention effect A 1 degree C rise with 50 ppm elevated carbon dioxide increased soybean yield by up to 4.9 percent.
Intervention effect A 1 degree C rise with 50 ppm elevated carbon dioxide shortened the average growing period of soybean by up to 2 days.
Intervention effect A 2 degree C rise with 50 ppm elevated carbon dioxide increased simulated soybean yield by up to 2.3 percent compared with control conditions.
Intervention effect A 1 degree C rise with 100 ppm elevated carbon dioxide increased soybean yield by 8.8 to 10.2 percent in all planting windows.
Intervention effect A 2 degree C rise with 100 ppm elevated carbon dioxide gave a soybean yield gain 3.1 to 3.9 percent lower than a 1 degree C rise.
Intervention effect Soybean yield increased by 5.2 to 8.5 percent with 50 ppm elevated carbon dioxide and a 1 degree C rise, when coupled with the 10 percent rainfall reduction.
Association Rise of temperature with elevated carbon dioxide generally increases soybean yield in the region.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grain yield decrease at higher salinity was larger in the salt-resistant variety than in salt-sensitive varieties.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Material: salt resistant varietye5
Outcome: decrease in grain yielde5
Direction: largere5
Comparator: salt sensitive varietiese5

Verbatim

t0
“Rice cultivars responses to different salinity levels”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53

e5
“The decrease in grain yield was larger in salt resistant variety, than in salt sensitive varieties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1271

Title

Rice cultivars responses to different salinity levels at coastal agricultural land of Yogyakarta

B Kurniasih; U Hasanah; N Muflikhah; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/686/1/012026

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation IR 64 and Situbagendit showed hardly any significant difference in most growth and yield variables.
Association Dendang, the salt-resistant rice, had the highest chlorophyll content at 2.5 dS.m −1 salinity.
Intervention effect Salinity up to 2.5 dS.m −1 increased stomatal conductance, shoot dry biomass and grain yield of rice.
Intervention effect Higher salinity levels decreased grain yield of rice.
Intervention effect Adding salinity up to 2.5 dS. m −1 in coastal sandy soil promoted better growth and yield of rice.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Depending on soil erosion, grain yield can decrease by 10–80%.

Taxon: grain cropse4
Treatment: erosion of the soile2
Outcome: yielde2
Direction: decreasee2
Value: 10–80%e2

Verbatim

e2
“depending on the erosion of the soil, the yield can decrease by 10–80%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–900

e4
“improvement of the nutritional regime and an increase in soil cultivation help reduce the negative impact of drought on the productivity of grain crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1139

Title

Typing of Agricultural Landscapes in the Volgograd Region

A. M. Belyakov Arid Ecosystems 2021. doi:10.1134/s2079096121010030

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 9%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2050s.

Taxon: chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material: short duration cultivare0
Treatment: short duration cultivare0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3%e0
Setting: Chefae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“On the other hand, the short duration cultivar at Chefa site could decrease grain yield by 9%, 3% and 3% for the respective time periods.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1422

t0
“chickpea”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–42

Title

Modeling climate change impact on chickpea production and adaptation options in the semi-arid North-Eastern Ethiopia

Adem Mohammed Ahmed; Tamado Tana; Piara Singh; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2016. doi:10.12895/jaeid.2016110.510

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 13% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 5% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 7% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 20% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Sirinka increases 34% in the 2050s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 12% in the 2030s.
Observation Projected chickpea grain yield at Chefa increases 22% in the 2050s.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 11% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect short duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 7% in baseline versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 9% in 2030s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect long duration cultivar changes Sirinka chickpea yield by 10% in 2050s versus the standard cultivar.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 9% in baseline.
Intervention effect Short duration cultivar could decrease Chefa chickpea yield by 3% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in baseline.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 47% in 2030s.
Intervention effect Supplemental irrigation could increase chickpea yield at Sirinka by 46% in 2050s.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

For cocoa agroforestry adopters, a one-millimeter rainfall decrease reduced yield by 2.17 kg/ha.

Taxon: cocoaTheobroma cacaot0
Material: adopterse0
Treatment: one-millimeter decrease in rainfalle0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: reducese0
Value: 2.17 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0
“A one-millimeter decrease in rainfall significantly reduces yield by 2.17 kg/ha for adopters and 2.84 kg/ha for non-adopters”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1128

t0
“cocoa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81

Title

Agroforestry as a climate change adaptation strategy: Evidence from Ghana's cocoa sector

Marlene Yu Lilin Wätzold; Katharina Krumbiegel; Pascal Tillie; et al. Agricultural Systems 2025. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104519

Other claims from this paper (5)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics