View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Halving insect visits caused little sunflower yield decrease .
Treatmentinsect visits were reduced by 50% e0 Directionlittle decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–695 t0 “in sunflower, combining a gradient in insect pollination ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–264 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar zein nanoparticles did not decrease pod set.
TreatmentFoliar applications of zein nanoparticles e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Foliar applications of zein nanoparticles did not increase flower abortion or decrease pod set ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1606 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–97 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the no-reduction yield type after nitrogen decrease , the number of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem did not differ significantly.
Treatmentnitrogen decrease treatment e2 Outcomenumber of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem e1 Verbatim
e1 “there was not significant differences in the number of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2212 e2 “After nitrogen decrease treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1817 e0 “erect panicle type rice variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the no-reduction yield type after nitrogen decrease , the area of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes (per stem and per plant) and the number of stems and branches did not differ significantly.
Treatmentnitrogen decrease treatment e2 Outcomearea of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes in a stem and in a plant, and number of stems and branches e1 Verbatim
e1 “the area of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes in a stem and in a plant, and number of stems and branches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2331 e2 “After nitrogen decrease treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1817 e0 “erect panicle type rice variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Expansin abundance did not decrease between 3- and 4-day-old hypocotyls, so the decrease in cell wall extensibility was not mediated by expansin.
Outcomeexpansin abundance e2 Qualifiernot mediated by a decrease e2 Verbatim
e0 “we critically tested several metrics (creep rate, creep rate×stress-1, in vitro cell wall extensibility (ϕ) and in vitro cell wall yield threshold (y)) for their ability to predict growth rates of etiolated Arabidopsis thaliana (L. Heynh.) hypocotyls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–525 e2 “the decrease in ϕ between 3- and 4-day-old hypocotyls was not mediated by a decrease in expansin abundance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1103 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Degeneration of rachis-branches and of spikelets does not explain the decrease in spikelet numbers per panicle.
Outcomedegeneration of rachis-branches e3 Qualifiernor that of spikelets e3 Verbatim
e3 “not by the degeneration of rachis-branches nor that of spikelets ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–645 t0 “rice [Oryza sativa ] yield in warmer regions of Japan ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–126 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed set did not decline in fields with higher selfing rates.
Directiondid not decrease e0 Settingfields with higher selfing rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “seed set did not decrease in fields with higher selfing rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1119 t0 “Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Shading did not reduce maximum spikelet number in Klein Toledo.
Outcomemaximum spikelet number e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Shading did not decrease maximum spikelet number in the tall standard cultivar Klein Toledo ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–660 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant and ear height remained stable when fertilizer rate fell from F100 to F50.
Treatmentdecrease in fertilizer rate from F100 to F50 e3 OutcomePlant and ear height e3 Directionno_change inferred e3 Verbatim
e0 “hybrid maize in autumn and spring growing season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–482 e3 “Plant and ear height remained stable with decrease in fertilizer rate from F100 to F50 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–797 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat stress did not significantly reduce days to 50% flowering.
Outcomenumber of days required for flowering of 50 % of plants e0 DirectionNo significant decrease e0 Settingconditions of heat stress e0 Verbatim
e0 “No significant decrease on the number of days required for flowering of 50 % of plants under conditions of heat stress were recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2372 t0 “TOMATO PLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–181 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.