Paper · 2010 · THE ASIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE

Effect of different concentration of CPPU and fruit thinning on yield and quality of Kiwifruit cv. Allison and Hayward.

Jayant Kumar; Disha Thakur

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The investigations were carried out during 2011 and 2012 at Regional Horticultural research station, Bajaura, to study the effect of different concentration of CPPU and fruit thinning on yield and quality of Kiwifruit cv. Allison and Hayward.The vines were ten years old at the start of study. One hundred twenty six uniform vines were selected in each cultivar. The trees were planted 6x3 m apart. The shoots of the each vines were tagged after fruit set and the tagged shoots were thinned (2 fruits/shoot, 3 fruits/shoot, 4 fruits/shoot, 5 fruits/shoot and 6 fruits/shoot). Tagged and thinned fruit vines of Allison and Hayward were sprayed with different concentration of CPPU (2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5 and 15.0 ppm) two weeks after fruit set. The results indicated that the maximum fruit yield, fruit weight, fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained when 4 fruits/shoots were retained and CPPU 10 ppm was sprayed in case of both the cultivars. Thinning treatments did not have any significant effect on fruit chemical properties. i.e. total soluble solid (TSS), titratable acidity, reducing sugars and total sugars content in both seasons of investigation. The results revealed that highest total soluble solids (TSS) and lowest acidity was obtained when vines were sprayed with CPPU 10 ppm as compared with control. Therefore, from these studies it can be concluded that thinning with 4 fruits/shoot resulted in optimum thinning and maximum production of 'A' grade fruits of better quality along with spray of CPPU @ 10 ppm with highest increase in net benefits over control, which is considered to be the best combination treatment used for producing maximum yield and improving fruit quality, especially fruit weight.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining four fruits per shoot with 10 ppm CPPU maximized fruit yield.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Material
Allison and Haywardt0
Treatment
4 fruits/shoots were retained and CPPU 10 ppm was sprayede0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum fruit yield, fruit weight, fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained when 4 fruits/shoots were retained and CPPU 10 ppm was sprayed in case of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kiwifruit cv. Allison and Hayward.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining four fruits per shoot with 10 ppm CPPU maximized fruit weight, length and breadth.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Material
Allison and Haywardt0
Treatment
4 fruits/shoots were retained and CPPU 10 ppm was sprayede0
Outcome
fruit weight, fruit length and fruit breadthe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum fruit yield, fruit weight, fruit length and fruit breadth was obtained when 4 fruits/shoots were retained and CPPU 10 ppm was sprayed in case of both the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kiwifruit cv. Allison and Hayward.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning had no significant effect on fruit total soluble solids, titratable acidity and sugars.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
Thinning treatmentse0
Outcome
total soluble solid (TSS), titratable acidity, reducing sugarse0
Direction
did not have any significant effecte0
Qualifier
both seasons of investigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning treatments did not have any significant effect on fruit chemical properties. i.e. total soluble solid (TSS), titratable acidity, reducing sugars and total sugars content in both seasons of investigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning had no significant effect on total sugar content.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
Thinning treatmentse0
Outcome
total sugars contente0
Direction
did not have any significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning treatments did not have any significant effect on fruit chemical properties. i.e. total soluble solid (TSS), titratable acidity, reducing sugars and total sugars content in both seasons of investigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU at 10 ppm gave the highest total soluble solids relative to control.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
CPPU 10 ppme0
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest total soluble solids (TSS) and lowest acidity was obtained when vines were sprayed with CPPU 10 ppm as compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU at 10 ppm gave the lowest acidity relative to control.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
CPPU 10 ppme0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest total soluble solids (TSS) and lowest acidity was obtained when vines were sprayed with CPPU 10 ppm as compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend four fruits per shoot and 10 ppm CPPU for yield, quality and net benefit.

Taxon
KiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
thinning with 4 fruits/shoote0
Outcome
best combination treatmente0
Qualifier
spray of CPPU @ 10 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thinning with 4 fruits/shoot resulted in optimum thinning and maximum production of 'A' grade fruits of better quality along with spray of CPPU @ 10 ppm with highest increase in net benefits over control, which is considered to be the best combination treatment used for producing maximum yield and improving fruit quality, especially fruit weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–94 · show in text ↑

forchlorfenuron · quality: sugar starch · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

forchlorfenuron · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.