Abstract
Excellent protection from 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)- s -triazine (simazine) injury at twice the dose needed for weed control was obtained by dipping the roots of strawberry plants ( Fragaria grandiflora Ehrh.) in a 10% slurry of activated carbon before transplanting. Protection was greater when the roots were dipped in the slurry of activated carbon than when activated carbon was applied in the transplant water. Protection was obtained from three different activated carbons. Protection from injury to varying degrees was observed when several other herbicides were used.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
A 10% activated-carbon root dip protected strawberry plants from simazine injury at twice the weed-control dose.
- Taxon
- strawberry plants
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassae0 - Organ / stage
- rootse0
- Treatment
- 10% slurry of activated carbone0
- Outcome
- simazine) injurye0
- Direction
- protectione0
- Qualifier
- twice the dose needed for weed controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Excellent protection from 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)- s -triazine (simazine) injury at twice the dose needed for weed control was obtained by dipping the roots of strawberry plants ( Fragaria grandiflora Ehrh.) in a 10% slurry of activated carbon before transplanting.”
t0“Strawberries”
Claim · model-written summary
Root dipping protected strawberries more than carbon in transplant water.
- Taxon
- StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- roots were dipped in the slurry of activated carbone0
- Outcome
- Protectione0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- activated carbon was applied in the transplant watere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Protection was greater when the roots were dipped in the slurry of activated carbon than when activated carbon was applied in the transplant water”
t0“Strawberries”
Claim · model-written summary
Three different activated carbons provided protection.
- Taxon
- StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
- Outcome
- Protectione0
- Value
- threee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Protection was obtained from three different activated carbons”
t0“Strawberries”
Claim · model-written summary
Several other herbicides produced varying degrees of protection.
- Taxon
- StrawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- several other herbicidese0
- Outcome
- Protection from injurye0
- Direction
- varying degreese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Protection from injury to varying degrees was observed when several other herbicides were used”
t0“Strawberries”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · crop injury · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
fertilization · control · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.