Paper · 2023 · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst)

Efficacy of postemergence grass herbicides and their effects on yield and quality of alfalfa during the establishment year.

Himmelstein, Frank J.

19
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Postemergence grass herbicides may decrease the dependence upon the currently available preplant incorporated herbicides for weed control during alfalfa establishment. Sethoxydim, fluazifop, haloxyfop, quizalofop, fenoxaprop, SC 1084 and BAS 517 02H evaluated in eight separate studies effectively controlled both annual grass weeds such as large crabgrass, fall panicum and yellow foxtail and perennial grass weeds such as quackgrass in spring seedings of alfalfa at several stages of maturity. The maximum first harvest alfalfa yields generally were obtained when the annual grass weeds were controlled prior to seven weeks after planting. In quackgrass-infested alfalfa seedings, herbicides were more effective when applied prior to the seven-leaf stage of quackgrass growth. Split and single applications of grass herbicides resulted in similar quackgrass control. Tank mixtures of grass herbicides with 2,4-DB controlled both the annual broadleaf and grass weeds. Preemergence treatments of several herbicides controlled annual grass weeds when applied at three to four times the rate required for postemergence control. Herbicides decreased total forage yields, however removal of the weed component increased alfalfa yields. Greater alfalfa yield increases were obtained at the first harvest when the weed component of the forage ranged from 50 to 90%. The weed component of the forage in addition to the time of the first harvest affected the forage quality. The CP content of the untreated annual weeds and quackgrass (8 to 15%) was lower than alfalfa (18 to 20%). The CP content of the forage increased as the weed component decreased. The ADF content of the first harvest forage varied between the annual grass weeds and alfalfa, however the higher ADF content of quackgrass (40%) compared to alfalfa (33 to 35%) will reduce the digestibility of the forage. The higher NDF content of the untreated annual grass weeds (65 to 75%) compared to alfalfa (48 to 55%) will reduce the voluntary intake of the forage. Reduced heribicide rates resulted in lower weed control but increased the CP content and decreased the ADF and NDF content of the remaining weed component. The lower weed component of the second harvest forage and the higher quality of the weed regrowth after the first harvest generally had little affect on the forage quality of the second harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven evaluated herbicides effectively controlled annual and perennial grass weeds in spring-seeded alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Sethoxydim, fluazifop, haloxyfop, quizalofop, fenoxaprop, SC 1084 and BAS 517 02He0
Interactor
large crabgrasse0weed
Outcome
annual grass weedse0
Direction
effectively controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sethoxydim, fluazifop, haloxyfop, quizalofop, fenoxaprop, SC 1084 and BAS 517 02H evaluated in eight separate studies effectively controlled both annual grass weeds such as large crabgrass, fall panicum and yellow foxtail and perennial grass weeds such as quackgrass in spring seedings of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–464 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum first-harvest alfalfa yields generally occurred when annual grass weeds were controlled before seven weeks after planting.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
annual grass weeds were controlled prior to seven weeks after plantinge0
Interactor
annual grass weedse0weed
Outcome
first harvest alfalfa yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum first harvest alfalfa yields generally were obtained when the annual grass weeds were controlled prior to seven weeks after planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–641 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides controlled quackgrass more effectively before its seven-leaf stage.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
herbicidese0
Interactor
quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
quackgrasse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
seven-leaf stage of quackgrass growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“herbicides were more effective when applied prior to the seven-leaf stage of quackgrass growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split and single herbicide applications gave similar quackgrass control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Split and single applications of grass herbicidese0
Interactor
quackgrasse0weed
Outcome
quackgrass controle0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
single applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Split and single applications of grass herbicides resulted in similar quackgrass control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixes of grass herbicides with 2,4-DB controlled annual broadleaf and grass weeds.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Tank mixtures of grass herbicides with 2,4-DBe0
Interactor
annual broadleafe0weed
Outcome
annual broadleaf and grass weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank mixtures of grass herbicides with 2,4-DB controlled both the annual broadleaf and grass weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence herbicide treatments controlled annual grass weeds at three to four times the postemergence rate.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Preemergence treatments of several herbicidese0
Interactor
annual grass weedse0weed
Outcome
annual grass weedse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
three to four timese0
Comparator
postemergence controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preemergence treatments of several herbicides controlled annual grass weeds when applied at three to four times the rate required for postemergence control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides decreased total forage yields.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Herbicidese0
Outcome
total forage yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicides decreased total forage yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of the weed component increased alfalfa yields.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
removal of the weed componente0
Outcome
alfalfa yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“removal of the weed component increased alfalfa yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1231 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-harvest alfalfa yield increases were greater when weeds comprised 50 to 90% of forage.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
first harveste0
Outcome
alfalfa yield increasese0
Direction
Greatere0
Value
50 to 90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater alfalfa yield increases were obtained at the first harvest when the weed component of the forage ranged from 50 to 90%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1359 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed proportion and first-harvest timing affected forage quality.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
first harveste0
Outcome
forage qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The weed component of the forage in addition to the time of the first harvest affected the forage quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated annual weeds and quackgrass had lower CP content than alfalfa.

Taxon
annual weedse0
Outcome
CP contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
8 to 15%e0
Qualifier
18 to 20%e0
Comparator
alfalfae0

Verbatim

e0

“The CP content of the untreated annual weeds and quackgrass (8 to 15%) was lower than alfalfa (18 to 20%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1573 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage CP content increased as its weed component decreased.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
weed component decreasede0
Outcome
CP content of the foragee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CP content of the forage increased as the weed component decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-harvest forage ADF content varied between annual grass weeds and alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
first harveste0
Outcome
ADF contente0
Direction
variede0
Comparator
annual grass weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ADF content of the first harvest forage varied between the annual grass weeds and alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1739 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quackgrass had higher ADF content than alfalfa, implying reduced forage digestibility.

Taxon
quackgrasse0
Outcome
ADF contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
40%e0
Qualifier
33 to 35%e0
Comparator
alfalfae0

Verbatim

e0

“the higher ADF content of quackgrass (40%) compared to alfalfa (33 to 35%) will reduce the digestibility of the forage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated annual grass weeds had higher NDF than alfalfa, implying reduced voluntary forage intake.

Taxon
annual grass weedse0
Outcome
NDF contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
65 to 75%e0
Qualifier
48 to 55%e0
Comparator
alfalfae0

Verbatim

e0

“The higher NDF content of the untreated annual grass weeds (65 to 75%) compared to alfalfa (48 to 55%) will reduce the voluntary intake of the forage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1869–2019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced herbicide rates gave lower weed control.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Reduced heribicide ratese0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced heribicide rates resulted in lower weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2075 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced herbicide rates increased CP content in the remaining weeds.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Reduced heribicide ratese0
Outcome
CP contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced heribicide rates resulted in lower weed control but increased the CP content and decreased the ADF and NDF content of the remaining weed component.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2175 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced herbicide rates decreased ADF and NDF in the remaining weed component.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Reduced heribicide ratese0
Outcome
ADF and NDF contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced heribicide rates resulted in lower weed control but increased the CP content and decreased the ADF and NDF content of the remaining weed component.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2175 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-harvest weed content and regrowth quality had little effect on second-harvest forage quality.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Organ / stage
second harveste0
Outcome
forage quality of the second harveste0
Direction
little affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower weed component of the second harvest forage and the higher quality of the weed regrowth after the first harvest generally had little affect on the forage quality of the second harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2176–2370 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–92 · show in text ↑

Sethoxydim · weed · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

52 papers: 26 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

herbicide · control · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · weed · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.