Paper · 1998 · Korean Journal of Weed Science

Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Minimizing Ozone Injury in Tobacco(Nicotiana tabacum L.)

K.S. Park; J.H. Cho; Ji-Young Sohn; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to find out the effects of ABA and IAA on activities of antioxidant enzymes, antioxidant content, and growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone. The exposure to ozone in tobacco plant significantly decreased plant height, but it did not show any difference in vegetative characteristics except plant height of IAA M treated. Total chlorophyll content of NC 82 was dramatically decreased with increase in days after ozone treatment. However, reduction of chlorophyll was minimized when plant growth regulators were treated before ozone exposure. Three days treament of ozone in tobacco increased ascorbic acid of oxidised form, while slightly decreased `in reduced ascorbic acid by IAA treatment. But seven days of ozone treatment showed increase in ascorbic acid and decrease in dehydroascorbic acid. Ozone treatment did not show any difference in glutathione content and glutathione reductase activity when plant growth regulators were treated. Activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD), ascorbate peroxidase(AP) and guaiacol peroxidase(GP) were increased by the exposure to ozone for three days. However, there were no difference in activities of SOD, AP and GP due to exposure to ozone for seven days. These reactions may be interpreted as protective responses to prevent or alleviate the damage of tobacco plant by ozone exposure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone significantly decreased tobacco height.

Treatment
exposure to ozonee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The exposure to ozone in tobacco plant significantly decreased plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–250 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll in NC 82 fell as days after ozone exposure increased.

Material
NC 82e0
Treatment
ozone treatmente0
Outcome
Total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll content of NC 82 was dramatically decreased with increase in days after ozone treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–460 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth regulators before ozone minimized chlorophyll loss.

Treatment
plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
reduction of chlorophylle0
Direction
minimizede0
Qualifier
before ozone exposuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction of chlorophyll was minimized when plant growth regulators were treated before ozone exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–573 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three days of ozone increased oxidized ascorbic acid.

Treatment
Three days treament of ozonee0
Outcome
ascorbic acid of oxidised forme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three days treament of ozone in tobacco increased ascorbic acid of oxidised form”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA slightly decreased reduced ascorbic acid.

Treatment
IAA treatmente0
Outcome
reduced ascorbic acide0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slightly decreased `in reduced ascorbic acid by IAA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–724 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven days of ozone increased ascorbic acid.

Treatment
seven days of ozone treatmente0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven days of ozone treatment showed increase in ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–792 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven days of ozone decreased dehydroascorbic acid.

Treatment
seven days of ozone treatmente0
Outcome
dehydroascorbic acide0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven days of ozone treatment showed increase in ascorbic acid and decrease in dehydroascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone did not change glutathione content or glutathione reductase activity under regulator treatment.

Treatment
Ozone treatmente0
Outcome
glutathione content and glutathione reductase activitye0
Direction
did not show any differencee0
Qualifier
when plant growth regulators were treatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ozone treatment did not show any difference in glutathione content and glutathione reductase activity when plant growth regulators were treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–974 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three days of ozone increased SOD, AP and GP activities.

Treatment
exposure to ozone for three dayse0
Outcome
Activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD), ascorbate peroxidase(AP) and guaiacol peroxidase(GP)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activities of superoxide dismutase(SOD), ascorbate peroxidase(AP) and guaiacol peroxidase(GP) were increased by the exposure to ozone for three days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1124 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven days of ozone showed no difference in SOD, AP and GP activities.

Treatment
exposure to ozone for seven dayse0
Outcome
activities of SOD, AP and GPe0
Direction
no differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no difference in activities of SOD, AP and GP due to exposure to ozone for seven days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of tobacco under exposure to ozone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–173 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret the responses as protective against ozone injury.

Treatment
ozone exposuree0
Outcome
protective responsese0
Qualifier
may be interpretede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These reactions may be interpreted as protective responses to prevent or alleviate the damage of tobacco plant by ozone exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1361 · show in text ↑

ozone · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

class · physiology: pigments · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ozone · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.