Paper · 2012 · 农业科学与技术:B

Pre-harvest Treatment of Zn & B Affects the Fruit Quality and Storability of Sweet Orange

Muhammad Muhammad; Sajid Sajid; Abdur-Rab; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Physico-chemical composition of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.) cv. blood red was determined in relation to different storage conditions and micronutrients application at department of horticulture, Agricultural University Peshawar, Pakistan during 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. The post-harvest quality of sweet orange was evaluated for 60 days storage with 20 days intervals. Fruit were harvested after the foliar application of zinc and boron in two consecutive seasons. The harvested fruits were stored at an ambient temperature (ATS) of 25 ± 2 °C and at low temperature storage (LTS) of 15 ± 2 °C with 60%-70% relative humidity (RH) for 60 days. Sweet oranges stored at LTS maintained better fruit quality than ATS. The foliar application of zinc and boron significantly enhanced fruit juice content, total soluble solids (TSS), ascorbic acid (AA) and non-reducing sugar (NRS) of fruit. However, fruit juice content, TSS and AA were observed significantly higher, when the fruit was treated with high zinc (1%) and low boron (0.02%). The percent of weight loss, disease incidence, TSS and reducing sugar (RS) increased with increasing the storage durations. A reduction was noted in fruit juice, AA and NRS with increasing the storage durations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature storage maintained better sweet orange fruit quality than ambient storage.

Taxon
Sweet orangesCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
LTSe0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
ATSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweet oranges stored at LTS maintained better fruit quality than ATS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc and boron significantly enhanced sweet orange fruit juice content, TSS and ascorbic acid.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
foliar application of zinc and borone0
Outcome
fruit juice content, total soluble solids (TSS), ascorbic acid (AA)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of zinc and boron significantly enhanced fruit juice content, total soluble solids (TSS), ascorbic acid (AA) and non-reducing sugar (NRS) of fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc and boron significantly enhanced sweet orange non-reducing sugar.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
foliar application of zinc and borone0
Outcome
non-reducing sugar (NRS)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of zinc and boron significantly enhanced fruit juice content, total soluble solids (TSS), ascorbic acid (AA) and non-reducing sugar (NRS) of fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High zinc and low boron yielded significantly higher juice content, TSS and ascorbic acid.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
high zinc (1%) and low boron (0.02%)e0
Outcome
fruit juice content, TSS and AAe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit juice content, TSS and AA were observed significantly higher, when the fruit was treated with high zinc (1%) and low boron (0.02%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1035 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer storage increased weight loss, disease incidence and TSS.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
storage durationse0
Outcome
percent of weight loss, disease incidence, TSSe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent of weight loss, disease incidence, TSS and reducing sugar (RS) increased with increasing the storage durations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer storage increased reducing sugar.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
storage durationse0
Outcome
reducing sugar (RS)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percent of weight loss, disease incidence, TSS and reducing sugar (RS) increased with increasing the storage durations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1159 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–65 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer storage reduced fruit juice, ascorbic acid and non-reducing sugar.

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensise1
Treatment
storage durationse0
Outcome
fruit juice, AA and NRSe0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A reduction was noted in fruit juice, AA and NRS with increasing the storage durations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–65 · show in text ↑

boron atom · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

cold · quality: grain · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.