Paper · 2019 · Insects

The Effects of a Cold Disinfestation on Bactrocera dorsalis Survival and Navel Orange Quality

Yan Fang; Fenfen Kang; Guoping Zhan; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck is an important economic product in South China, but the presence of quarantine pests in this product proposes the potential threat to international trade security. To find a proper phytosanitary cold treatment for Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), commonly called oriental fruit fly, one of the most serious quarantine insects in navel orange, eggs in petri dish and larvae in navel orange fruits were exposed to a 1.7 °C cold chamber for 0–11 days to compare the tolerance to cold treatment. The 2nd instar larva (4 days) is the most tolerant stage, and the estimated time for 99.9968% mortality at the 95% confidence level is 11.3 (9.5, 14.6) days. Then 15 days was selected as the target time for the confirmatory tests, resulting in no survivors from 37,792 treated larvae with the efficacy of 99.9921% mortality at the 95% confidence level. The quality assessments were conducted to compare the effect on the navel orange fruit between cold treatment and the conventional cold storage. Results indicated that the cold treatment did not negatively affect the fruit quality. Therefore, this cold treatment showed potential as a commercial quarantine treatment for navel orange in international trade.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second instar larvae were the most cold tolerant stage.

Interactor
2nd instar larvae0
Outcome
most tolerant stagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The 2nd instar larva (4 days) is the most tolerant stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated treatment time for 99.9968% mortality was 11.3 days.

Outcome
mortalitye0
Value
99.9968%e0
Qualifier
95% confidence levele0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the estimated time for 99.9968% mortality at the 95% confidence level is 11.3 (9.5, 14.6) days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifteen days of cold treatment yielded no surviving larvae among 37,792.

Treatment
15 dayse0
Outcome
no survivorse0
Value
99.9921%e0
Qualifier
37,792 treated larvaee0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“15 days was selected as the target time for the confirmatory tests, resulting in no survivors from 37,792 treated larvae with the efficacy of 99.9921% mortality at the 95% confidence level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold treatment did not negatively affect orange fruit quality relative to conventional storage.

Taxon
navel orangeCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
cold treatmente0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
did not negatively affecte0
Comparator
conventional cold storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compare the effect on the navel orange fruit between cold treatment and the conventional cold storage. Results indicated that the cold treatment did not negatively affect the fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1124 · show in text ↑

cold · quality: grain · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.