Paper · 1989 · Weed Technology

Microfoil Boom Application of Picloram and 2,4-D for Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Control

Rodney G. Lym

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Leafy spurge control with picloram and various 2,4-D formulations was evaluated to determine the optimum treatment combination and carrier volume for aerial application using a microfoil boom. Leafy spurge control was similar when the same herbicide treatments were applied at 94 and 47 L/ha but declined at 23 L/ha. Leafy spurge control was better when similar herbicide treatments were applied with a one-row microfoil nozzle boom compared to a two-row nozzle. Leafy spurge control 12 months after treatment tended to be better with picloram at 0.28 and 0.56 kg ae/ha applied with 2,4-D mixed amine compared to picloram plus 2,4-D dimethylamine or oil-soluble amine formulations during average growing conditions. However, picloram plus 2,4-D oil-soluble amine was the best formulation in dry conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafy spurge control was similar at 94 and 47 L/ha carrier volumes.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
applied at 94 and 47 L/hae1
Outcome
Leafy spurge controle1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
23 L/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge control with picloram and various 2,4-D formulations was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leafy spurge control was similar when the same herbicide treatments were applied at 94 and 47 L/ha but declined at 23 L/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafy spurge control declined at 23 L/ha compared with 94 and 47 L/ha.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
23 L/hae1
Outcome
Leafy spurge controle1
Direction
declinede1
Comparator
94 and 47 L/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge control with picloram and various 2,4-D formulations was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leafy spurge control was similar when the same herbicide treatments were applied at 94 and 47 L/ha but declined at 23 L/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafy spurge control was better with a one-row microfoil nozzle boom than with a two-row nozzle boom.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
one-row microfoil nozzle boome2
Outcome
Leafy spurge controle2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
two-row nozzlee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge control with picloram and various 2,4-D formulations was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leafy spurge control was better when similar herbicide treatments were applied with a one-row microfoil nozzle boom compared to a two-row nozzle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafy spurge control 12 months after treatment tended to be better with picloram at 0.28 and 0.56 kg ae/ha with 2,4-D mixed amine than with other picloram plus 2,4-D formulations under average growing conditions.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
picloram at 0.28 and 0.56 kg ae/ha applied with 2,4-D mixed aminee3
Outcome
Leafy spurge control 12 months after treatmente3
Direction
tended to be bettere3
Comparator
picloram plus 2,4-D dimethylamine or oil-soluble amine formulationse3
Setting
average growing conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge control with picloram and various 2,4-D formulations was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“Leafy spurge control 12 months after treatment tended to be better with picloram at 0.28 and 0.56 kg ae/ha applied with 2,4-D mixed amine compared to picloram plus 2,4-D dimethylamine or oil-soluble amine formulations during average growing conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–714 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picloram plus 2,4-D oil-soluble amine was the best formulation in dry conditions.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
picloram plus 2,4-D oil-soluble aminee4
Outcome
best formulatione4
Direction
beste4
Setting
dry conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge control with picloram and various 2,4-D formulations was evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“picloram plus 2,4-D oil-soluble amine was the best formulation in dry conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–805 · show in text ↑

amine · control · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

2,4-D · control · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

picloram · control · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.