Paper · 2010 · THE ASIAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURE

Optimum dose of phosphorus and potassium for increased yield and quality in garlic under Akola condition.

Yogesh R Nukte; S. M. Ghawade; P. P. Kolhe

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Y.R. NUKTE Department of Horticulture Post Graduate Institute, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, AKOLA (M.S.) INDIA ABSTRACT The experiment was conducted during the year 2008-09 on Agrifound white variety of garlic to find out an optimum dose of phosphorus and potassium. The yield and yield attributing characters like bulb weight, size of bulb and cloves per bulb were found maximum with application of 125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium ha, respectively. While in present investigation an application 89.13 kg phosphorus and 67.66 kg potassium ha was considered as economically optimum. The maximum benefit cost ratio was 1.12 and 1.22 with an application of 125 kg phosphorus 75 kg Potassium ha, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

yield was maximal at the reported phosphorus and potassium application.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium hae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and yield attributing characters like bulb weight, size of bulb and cloves per bulb were found maximum with application of 125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

bulb weight was maximal at the reported phosphorus and potassium application.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium hae0
Outcome
bulb weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and yield attributing characters like bulb weight, size of bulb and cloves per bulb were found maximum with application of 125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

size of bulb was maximal at the reported phosphorus and potassium application.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium hae0
Outcome
size of bulbe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and yield attributing characters like bulb weight, size of bulb and cloves per bulb were found maximum with application of 125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cloves per bulb was maximal at the reported phosphorus and potassium application.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium hae0
Outcome
cloves per bulbe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and yield attributing characters like bulb weight, size of bulb and cloves per bulb were found maximum with application of 125 kg phosphorus and 75 kg potassium ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered this application economically optimal.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
89.13 kg phosphorus and 67.66 kg potassium hae0
Outcome
economically optimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an application 89.13 kg phosphorus and 67.66 kg potassium ha was considered as economically optimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphorus application gave a maximum benefit cost ratio of 1.12.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
125 kg phosphoruse0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.12e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum benefit cost ratio was 1.12 and 1.22 with an application of 125 kg phosphorus 75 kg Potassium ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The potassium application gave a maximum benefit cost ratio of 1.22.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75 kg Potassium hae0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.22e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum benefit cost ratio was 1.12 and 1.22 with an application of 125 kg phosphorus 75 kg Potassium ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–82 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

32 papers: 31 positive, 1 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

potassium · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

42 papers: 40 positive, 2 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

potassium · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.