Abstract
The present investigation was carried out to study the effect of phosphorus application timings and its sources in wheat-sorghum cropping system during rabi 2004 and kharif 2005, The soil was loamy in texture, neutral in reaction with low available N, P and OC and medium in available K. The treatments comprising of two factors viz. four P application timings to preceding wheat crop and second factor comprising four sources of P applied to the succeeding sorghum fodder crop in split plot design. Study indicated that wheat crop performed better with application of P than its delayed application through improvement in P up-take. However, in subsequent sorghum fodder crop, delayed application of P in preceding wheat crop proved instrumental in production of higher fodder yield. Among sources FYM as a source of P in sorghum, caused phenomenal increase in growth parameters. Delayed application of P in wheat and application of P in sorghum through different sources favoured crude protein content. However, effect on crude fiber content of the fodder sorghum was non-significant. Delayed application of P in wheat followed by recommended P through FYM in sorghum proved beneficial with a benefit cost ratio ranging from 2.07 to 2.08.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Applying phosphorus to wheat improved wheat performance compared with delayed application.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- application of Pe0
- Outcome
- performed bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- delayed applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat crop performed better with application of P than its delayed application through improvement in P up-take”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying phosphorus to wheat improved P uptake compared with delayed application.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- application of Pe0
- Outcome
- P up-takee0
- Direction
- improvemente0
- Comparator
- delayed applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat crop performed better with application of P than its delayed application through improvement in P up-take”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed phosphorus application to preceding wheat increased subsequent sorghum fodder yield.
SorghumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in subsequent sorghum fodder crop, delayed application of P in preceding wheat crop proved instrumental in production of higher fodder yield”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM as a phosphorus source increased sorghum growth parameters.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“FYM as a source of P in sorghum, caused phenomenal increase in growth parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed phosphorus application to wheat favored crude protein content in fodder sorghum.
- Taxon
- fodder sorghumt0
- Treatment
- Delayed application of P in wheate0
- Outcome
- crude protein contente0
- Direction
- favourede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Delayed application of P in wheat and application of P in sorghum through different sources favoured crude protein content”
t0“fodder sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus sources applied to sorghum favored crude protein content.
- Treatment
- application of P in sorghum through different sourcese0
- Outcome
- crude protein contente0
- Direction
- favourede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Delayed application of P in wheat and application of P in sorghum through different sources favoured crude protein content”
Claim · model-written summary
The phosphorus treatments had a nonsignificant effect on sorghum crude fiber content.
Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“effect on crude fiber content of the fodder sorghum was non-significant”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed phosphorus in wheat followed by FYM phosphorus in sorghum had a benefit cost ratio of 2.07 to 2.08.
- Treatment
- recommended P through FYM in sorghume0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- beneficiale0
- Value
- 2.07 to 2.08e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Delayed application of P in wheat followed by recommended P through FYM in sorghum proved beneficial with a benefit cost ratio ranging from 2.07 to 2.08”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Triticum aestivum · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
phosphorus · yield · SorghumResults differ
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ
103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
116 papers more in this group
See all 120 papers →phosphorus · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.