Abstract
In field and pot experiments the effect of selected pesticides on the nitrogenase activity, number of soil microorganisms, and yield of hybrid lucerne was investigated. The obtained results show that crop protection preparations applied in the experiment (seed dressing compound Funaben T and Pivot 100SL herbicide) reduced the activity of nitrogenase in the active strain of Sinorhizobium meliloti both under conditions of pot and field experiments. In addition, the authors observed a noxious influence of the applied pesticides on nodulation, root development and yield of lucerne. Furthermore, in the first days after their application, the employed herbicide and fungicide inhibited multiplication of soil microorganisms under lucerne plantations, while later they were found to stimulate their multiplication.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Funaben T and Pivot 100SL reduced nitrogenase activity in Sinorhizobium meliloti under pot and field conditions.
- Taxon
- Hybrid Lucerne
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- seed dressing compound Funaben T and Pivot 100SL herbicidee0
- Interactor
- Sinorhizobium meliloti
Sinorhizobium melilotie0symbiont
- Outcome
- activity of nitrogenase in the active strain of Sinorhizobium melilotie0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- pot and field experimentse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“crop protection preparations applied in the experiment (seed dressing compound Funaben T and Pivot 100SL herbicide) reduced the activity of nitrogenase in the active strain of Sinorhizobium meliloti both under conditions of pot and field experiments”
t0“Hybrid Lucerne”
Claim · model-written summary
Applied pesticides harmed lucerne nodulation, root development and yield.
- Taxon
- lucerne
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- applied pesticidese0
- Outcome
- nodulation, root development and yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“noxious influence of the applied pesticides on nodulation, root development and yield of lucerne”
Claim · model-written summary
The herbicide and fungicide initially inhibited soil microorganism multiplication under lucerne.
- Taxon
- lucerne
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- herbicide and fungicidee0
- Outcome
- multiplication of soil microorganismse0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
- Qualifier
- in the first days after their applicatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“in the first days after their application, the employed herbicide and fungicide inhibited multiplication of soil microorganisms under lucerne plantations”
Claim · model-written summary
The herbicide and fungicide later stimulated soil microorganism multiplication.
- Taxon
- Hybrid Lucerne
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- multiplicatione0
- Direction
- stimulatee0
- Qualifier
- latere0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“while later they were found to stimulate their multiplication”
t0“Hybrid Lucerne”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →insecticide · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
fungicide · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.