Paper · 1976 · Environmental Entomology

Influence of Cultivars and Pesticides on Pea Aphid, Spotted Alfalfa Aphid, and Associated Arthropod Taxa in a Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem1,2

E. B. Radcliffe; R. W. Weires; R. E. Stucker; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Influence of cultivars and pesticides on population trends and interrelationships of pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), spotted alfalfa aphid, Therioaphis maculata (Buckton), and associated arthropod taxa were studied over 3 growing seasons at Rose-mount, Minn. Greatest cultivar differences in resistance were for pea aphid and spotted alfalfa aphid. Cultivar differences were less for other pest species, but significant some sampling periods. Pesticides increased forage yields, the benefit varying with severity of pest pressure and cultivar. Fungicidal sprays resulted in greater yield increases than did insecticidal sprays; combinations were additive in effect. Populations of both aphid species and of associated entomophagous taxa were consistently higher in subplots treated with fungicides. Fungicidal sprays enhanced aphid populations by suppressing entomogenous fungi. Weekly correlations between populations of aphids and associated arthropod taxa revealed consistent patterns of significant positive correlation. Taxa tending to strong association with pea aphid included: tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois); alfalfa plant bug, Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze); the coccinellids, Hippodamia convergens Guerin-Meneville, H. tredecimpunctata tibialis (Say), and Coleomegilla maculata lengi Timberlake; Orius insidiosus (Say); Chrysopa spp.; hemerobiids; syrphids; spiders; nabids; and parasitic wasps. Taxa tending to strong association with spotted alfalfa aphid included potato leafhopper, Empoasca fabae (Harris); hemerobiids; nabids; Orius insidiosus ; spiders; and parasitic wasps. Strong positive correlations between either aphid species and any entomophagous taxon were interpreted as evidence of a density-dependent relationship.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar resistance differed most for pea aphid and spotted alfalfa aphid.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Interactor
pea aphidAcyrthosiphon pisume0pest
Second interactor
spotted alfalfa aphide0pest
Outcome
cultivar differences in resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Acyrthosiphon pisum
Acyrthosiphon pisum · InteractorShipher Wu (photograph) and Gee-way Lin (aphid provision), National Taiwan University · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Greatest cultivar differences in resistance were for pea aphid and spotted alfalfa aphid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–357 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar differences for other pest species were smaller but sometimes significant.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
Cultivar differencese0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
some sampling periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cultivar differences were less for other pest species, but significant some sampling periods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pesticides raised forage yield, with benefit dependent on pest pressure and cultivar.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Pesticidese0
Outcome
forage yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
severity of pest pressure and cultivare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pesticides increased forage yields, the benefit varying with severity of pest pressure and cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–552 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicidal sprays increased yield more than insecticidal sprays.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Fungicidal sprayse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greater yield increasese0
Comparator
insecticidal sprayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicidal sprays resulted in greater yield increases than did insecticidal sprays; combinations were additive in effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fungicide and insecticide sprays had additive yield effects.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
combinationse0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
additivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicidal sprays resulted in greater yield increases than did insecticidal sprays; combinations were additive in effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treated plots had higher aphid populations.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
Populations of both aphid speciese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Populations of both aphid species and of associated entomophagous taxa were consistently higher in subplots treated with fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treated plots had higher populations of entomophagous taxa.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
associated entomophagous taxae0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Populations of both aphid species and of associated entomophagous taxa were consistently higher in subplots treated with fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–807 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides enhanced aphid populations by suppressing entomogenous fungi.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Fungicidal sprayse0
Outcome
aphid populationse0
Qualifier
suppressing entomogenous fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fungicidal sprays enhanced aphid populations by suppressing entomogenous fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–887 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly aphid and associated arthropod populations had consistent significant positive correlations.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
positive correlatione0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Minnesota Alfalfa Ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weekly correlations between populations of aphids and associated arthropod taxa revealed consistent patterns of significant positive correlation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1033 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

insecticide · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

application · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 31 positive, 7 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

fungicide · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.