Paper · 2010 · Ghana Journal of Horticulture

BASIL (OCIMUM BASILICUM) INTERCROP AS A PEST MANAGEMENT TOOL IN OKRA CULTIVATION IN THE ACCRA PLAINS.

Christiana Amoatey; Elizabeth Q. Acquah

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out at the University of Ghana farm, Legon, during the minor rainy season of 2008 to ascertain the potential role of basil (Ocimum basilicum) as an intercrop for biological pest management in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) production. The experimental design was a split-split-plot with three replications. Main plot treatments were pure okra and basil-okra intercrops; subplot treatment comprised insect pest and disease control while sub-sub plots comprised weed control regimes. Results showed a potential reduction in insect pest population in the basil-okra intercrops resulting in a 23% decrease in insect pests compared to the pure stand okra. An interaction between okra-basil intercrop and insecticide resulted in approximately 39% reduction in insect pest population. Effects on okra fruit yield and weed control in the intercrop compared to the okra pure stands were not significant. There were no positive interactions among the factors for fruit yield and weed control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The basil-okra intercrop reduced insect pest population by 23% compared with pure okra.

Treatment
basil-okra intercropse1
Interactor
insect pestse1pest
Outcome
insect pest populatione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
23%e1
Comparator
pure stand okrae1
Setting
University of Ghana farm, Legone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed a potential reduction in insect pest population in the basil-okra intercrops resulting in a 23% decrease in insect pests compared to the pure stand okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–674 · show in text ↑
e0

“as an intercrop for biological pest management in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–258 · show in text ↑
e5

“An experiment was carried out at the University of Ghana farm, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of okra-basil intercrop and insecticide reduced insect pest population by approximately 39%.

Treatment
okra-basil intercrop and insecticidee2
Interactor
insect peste2pest
Outcome
insect pest populatione2
Direction
reductione2
Value
39%e2
Setting
University of Ghana farm, Legone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“An interaction between okra-basil intercrop and insecticide resulted in approximately 39% reduction in insect pest population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–801 · show in text ↑
e0

“as an intercrop for biological pest management in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–258 · show in text ↑
e5

“An experiment was carried out at the University of Ghana farm, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra fruit yield and weed control in the intercrop were not significantly different from the pure okra stands.

Treatment
intercrope3
Outcome
okra fruit yield and weed controle3
Direction
not significante3
Comparator
okra pure standse3
Setting
University of Ghana farm, Legone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Effects on okra fruit yield and weed control in the intercrop compared to the okra pure stands were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–918 · show in text ↑
e0

“as an intercrop for biological pest management in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–258 · show in text ↑
e5

“An experiment was carried out at the University of Ghana farm, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no positive interactions among the factors for okra fruit yield and weed control.

Treatment
interactions among the factorse4
Outcome
fruit yield and weed controle4
Direction
no positive interactionse4
Setting
University of Ghana farm, Legone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“There were no positive interactions among the factors for fruit yield and weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1006 · show in text ↑
e0

“as an intercrop for biological pest management in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–258 · show in text ↑
e5

“An experiment was carried out at the University of Ghana farm, Legon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑

intercropping · weed · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

intercropping · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

insecticide · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.