Abstract
This study was carried out to obtain fundamental information of growth response of interior landscape plants under a fluorescent lighting, a sunlight at indoor. Ficus elastica Roxb. vu. decora Hort, Spathiphyllum 'Clevelandii', Codiaeum variegatum Blume var. pictum Mvell. Arg. 'Exalant' and Cordyline terminalis Kunth var. red edge Hort were examined under 100lux, 500lux, 1,000lux and 2,000lux light intensity consisted of fluorescent lighting and sunlight at indoor condition. Result of experiments are as follows; 1. A Ficus elastica Roxb. var. decora Hort plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight. A plant growth status showed the best result under 2,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lighting in cases of all conditions. 2. A Spathiphyllum 'Clevelandii' showed the best effective adaptations under law intensity among experimental plants. A Spathiphyllum 'Clevelandii', plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight. A plant growth status showed the best result under 1,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lighting in cases of all conditions. 3. It need the best high establishment of fluorescent lighting among experimental plants for good plant growth. A Codiaeum variegatum Blume var. pictum Mvell. Arg. 'Exalant' plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight. A plant growth status was better showed under high light intensity in case of same light source. A plant growth status showed the best result under 2,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lighting. 4. A Cordyline terminalis Kunth var. red edge Hort plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight. but, A plant growth status was better showed under than 2,000lux in cases of all intensity of fluorescent lighting. while, A plant growth status was better showed under in cases of all intensity of sunlight.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Ficus elastica grew better under fluorescent lighting than under sunlight.
- Taxon
- Ficus elastica
Ficus elasticae1 - Treatment
- fluorescent lightinge1
- Outcome
- plant growth statuse1
- Direction
- bettere1
- Comparator
- sunlighte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A Ficus elastica Roxb. var. decora Hort plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight”
Claim · model-written summary
Spathiphyllum Clevelandii grew better under fluorescent lighting than under sunlight.
- Taxon
- Spathiphyllum
Spathiphyllume5 - Treatment
- fluorescent lightinge5
- Outcome
- plant growth statuse5
- Direction
- bettere5
- Comparator
- sunlighte5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“A Spathiphyllum 'Clevelandii', plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight”
Claim · model-written summary
Codiaeum variegatum grew better under fluorescent lighting than under sunlight.
- Taxon
- Codiaeum variegatum
Codiaeum variegatume6 - Treatment
- fluorescent lightinge6
- Outcome
- plant growth statuse6
- Direction
- bettere6
- Comparator
- sunlighte6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“A Codiaeum variegatum Blume var. pictum Mvell. Arg. 'Exalant' plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight”
Claim · model-written summary
Cordyline terminalis grew better under fluorescent lighting than under sunlight.
- Taxon
- Cordyline terminalis
.jpg?width=60)
Cordyline fruticosae0 - Treatment
- fluorescent lightinge0
- Outcome
- plant growth statuse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- sunlighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A Cordyline terminalis Kunth var. red edge Hort plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight”
Claim · model-written summary
Spathiphyllum grew best under 1,000 lux of fluorescent lighting.
- Taxon
- SpathiphyllumSpathiphyllume3
- Treatment
- 1,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lightinge4
- Outcome
- plant growth statuse4
- Direction
- beste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“A Spathiphyllum 'Clevelandii' showed the best effective adaptations under law intensity among experimental plants”
e4“A plant growth status showed the best result under 1,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lighting in cases of all conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Ficus elastica grew best under 2,000 lux of fluorescent lighting.
- Taxon
- Ficus elasticaFicus elasticae1
- Treatment
- 2,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lightinge2
- Outcome
- plant growth statuse2
- Direction
- beste2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A Ficus elastica Roxb. var. decora Hort plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight”
e2“A plant growth status showed the best result under 2,000lux light intensity of fluorescent lighting in cases of all conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Cordyline terminalis growth status was better under fluorescent lighting at the various intensities than at 2,000 lux.
- Taxon
- Cordyline terminalisCordyline fruticosae0
- Treatment
- fluorescent lightinge1
- Outcome
- plant growth statuse1
- Direction
- bettere1
- Comparator
- 2,000luxe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A Cordyline terminalis Kunth var. red edge Hort plant growth status was better showed under fluorescent lighting than sunlight”
e1“A plant growth status was better showed under than 2,000lux in cases of all intensity of fluorescent lighting”
The same questions in other papers
light · growth · SpathiphyllumPositive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
light · growth · Ficus elastica (rubber plant)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
light · growth · Codiaeum variegatum (garden croton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.