Paper · 2007 · Pestycydy

Impact of adjuvants on: phenmedipham, desmedipham and ethofumesate residues in soil and plant

Mariusz Kucharski

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aim of investigations was to evaluate the influence of herbicides and adjuvant application on residues in soil and plant material. Field experiments were carried out during 2003-2005 on arable field localized in South-West Poland. Herbicidal preparation to control weeds in sugar beet (containing phenmedipham, desmedipham and ethofumesate), was applied at recommended dose, reduced dose and at reduced dose in mixture with three different adjuvants (mineral oil, plant oil and surfactant). Samples of soil and roots of sugar beet were taken on the day at sugar beet lifting. Herbicide residues in all samples were determined using high performance liquid chromatography with UV-detection. The highest concentration of herbicide active substances were determined in samples from field plots, where herbicidal preparation was applied at full (recommended) dose. Reduction of herbicide dose caused a decrease of residues. The addition of adjuvants caused an increase of the herbicide active substance residue in the soil and roots of sugar beet comparing plots with a reduced dose of preparation without adjuvants added. Residues of active substances determined in roots of sugar beet did not exceed EU acceptable limits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended herbicide dose gave the highest active substance residue concentrations.

Treatment
full (recommended) dosee0
Outcome
concentration of herbicide active substancese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest concentration of herbicide active substances were determined in samples from field plots, where herbicidal preparation was applied at full (recommended) dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing the herbicide dose decreased residues.

Treatment
Reduction of herbicide dosee0
Outcome
residuese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of herbicide dose caused a decrease of residues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–923 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adjuvants increased herbicide residue in sugar beet roots relative to reduced dose without adjuvants.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
addition of adjuvantse0
Outcome
herbicide active substance residue in the soil and roots of sugar beete0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
reduced dose of preparation without adjuvants addede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of adjuvants caused an increase of the herbicide active substance residue in the soil and roots of sugar beet comparing plots with a reduced dose of preparation without adjuvants added.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet root residues did not exceed EU acceptable limits.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
Residues of active substances determined in roots of sugar beete0
Qualifier
EU acceptable limitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residues of active substances determined in roots of sugar beet did not exceed EU acceptable limits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1223 · show in text ↑

adjuvant · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.