Paper · 2009 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFECT OF WATER DEFICIT IRRIGATION ON STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA) FRUIT QUALITY

L.A. Terry; G.A. Chope; J.G. Bordonaba

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growers are under increasing pressure to demonstrate that their water abstractions for irrigation are reasonable, justified and environmentally sustainable. Deficit irrigation (DI) is one means of reducing water usage. However, many authors have shown that DI can reduce berry size and yield in strawberry plants. The present study demonstrated that whilst DI did detrimentally affect berry size, it had a profound influence on both fruit physiology and biochemistry. Dry matter content as a proportion of fresh weight was increased by a quarter in both primary and secondary position fruit (primary truss) from water-stressed plants as compared to fruit harvested from plants held at or near field capacity. Strawberry 'Elsanta' fruit from plants that received less water had higher levels of abscisic acid (ABA). Concomitant to this, the concentration of some taste-related (viz. monosaccharides and sugar:acid ratios) and health-related compounds/parameters (viz. antioxidant capacity and total phenolics) were generally much greater in DI-treated fruit. Glucose and fructose concentrations were 1.2-fold higher in DI-treated as compared to non-drought-stressed fruit. Similarly, total phenolics were up to 1.4-fold higher in fruit from DI-treated plants. The effect of inoculation at anthesis with Botrytis cinerea on ripe fruit was also tested. Fruit derived from inoculated plants displayed symptoms of grey mould postharvest disease earlier than non-inoculated fruit, and had double the concentration of ABA. Inoculation had no significant effect on any other target analytes measured. There was no interaction between water treatment and inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation detrimentally affected strawberry berry size.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
DIe0
Outcome
berry sizee0
Direction
detrimentally affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DI did detrimentally affect berry size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–395 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation increased dry matter proportion by a quarter in primary and secondary position strawberry fruit relative to fruit near field capacity.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Organ / stage
primary and secondary position fruit (primary truss)e0
Treatment
water-stressede0
Outcome
Dry matter content as a proportion of fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
a quartere0
Comparator
plants held at or near field capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter content as a proportion of fresh weight was increased by a quarter in both primary and secondary position fruit (primary truss) from water-stressed plants as compared to fruit harvested from plants held at or near field capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit of less-watered strawberry Elsanta plants had higher abscisic acid levels.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Elsantae0
Treatment
less watere0
Outcome
levels of abscisic acid (ABA)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strawberry 'Elsanta' fruit from plants that received less water had higher levels of abscisic acid (ABA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation generally increased monosaccharides and sugar:acid ratios in strawberry fruit.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
DI-treatede0
Outcome
monosaccharides and sugar:acid ratiose0
Direction
generally much greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of some taste-related (viz. monosaccharides and sugar:acid ratios) and health-related compounds/parameters (viz. antioxidant capacity and total phenolics) were generally much greater in DI-treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation generally increased antioxidant capacity and total phenolics in strawberry fruit.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
DI-treatede0
Outcome
antioxidant capacity and total phenolicse0
Direction
generally much greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“health-related compounds/parameters (viz. antioxidant capacity and total phenolics) were generally much greater in DI-treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose concentration was 1.2-fold higher in deficit-irrigated than non-drought-stressed strawberry fruit.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
DI-treatede0
Outcome
Glucosee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.2-folde0
Comparator
non-drought-stressed fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glucose and fructose concentrations were 1.2-fold higher in DI-treated as compared to non-drought-stressed fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fructose concentration was 1.2-fold higher in deficit-irrigated than non-drought-stressed strawberry fruit.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
DI-treatede0
Outcome
fructosee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.2-folde0
Comparator
non-drought-stressed fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glucose and fructose concentrations were 1.2-fold higher in DI-treated as compared to non-drought-stressed fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolics were up to 1.4-fold higher in fruit from deficit-irrigated strawberry plants.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
DI-treatede0
Outcome
total phenolicse0
Direction
highere0
Value
up to 1.4-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolics were up to 1.4-fold higher in fruit from DI-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from Botrytis-inoculated strawberry plants developed grey mould symptoms earlier than non-inoculated fruit.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
inoculation at anthesis with Botrytis cinereae1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
symptoms of grey mould postharvest diseasee0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
non-inoculated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit derived from inoculated plants displayed symptoms of grey mould postharvest disease earlier than non-inoculated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1473 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation at anthesis with Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from Botrytis-inoculated strawberry plants had double the ABA concentration.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
inoculation at anthesis with Botrytis cinereae1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
concentration of ABAe0
Direction
doublee0
Value
doublee0
Comparator
non-inoculated fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit derived from inoculated plants displayed symptoms of grey mould postharvest disease earlier than non-inoculated fruit, and had double the concentration of ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1514 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation at anthesis with Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis inoculation had no significant effect on other measured target analytes in strawberry fruit.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
inoculation at anthesis with Botrytis cinereae1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
any other target analytes measurede0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation had no significant effect on any other target analytes measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1591 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation at anthesis with Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no interaction between water treatment and Botrytis inoculation in strawberry fruit.

Taxon
STRAWBERRYFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
interaction between water treatment and inoculatione0
Direction
no interactione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no interaction between water treatment and inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1657 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation at anthesis with Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY (FRAGARIA × ANANASSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–70 · show in text ↑

Botrytis cinerea · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

65 papers: 40 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 33 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

drought · quality: grain · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.