Abstract
'Shingo' pears were seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) film with different thickness of 0.04. 0.06, 0.07, and 0.08mm and stored for five months in an experimental storehouse with the temperature varyine 0 to and relative humidity varying 86 to 89%. The atmosphere in PE film bags was modified to 5-l4% oxygen with 3-5% carbon dioxide depending on the film thickness and the storage period. Packaging of pears with PE film effectively reduced the weight loss, which resulted in good appearance after 5 months' storage, while non-packaged pears showed a slight wilt. Decay occurrence was not significantly different among the treatments. but role browning occurred a little more in packaged lots than in non-packaged lot. The sensory panel rated the pears front 0.07mm-thick bag highest in flavor, texture, and juiciness, which might be due to the high sugar content and low titratable acidity. The firmness of pear flesh decreased with the stogare time and its change was found to be highly correlated with that of cellulase activity (correlation coefficient= -0.946). Thisresult indicated that cellulase might be one of the enzymes responsible for the softening of pear fruit during storage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Polyethylene film packaging reduced weight loss of Shingo pears compared with non-packaged pears.
- Treatment
- seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) filme0
- Outcome
- weight losse2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Comparator
- non-packaged pearse3
PyrusOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Shingo' pears were seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) film”
e2“Packaging of pears with PE film effectively reduced the weight loss, which resulted in good appearance”
e3“non-packaged pears showed a slight wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
Non-packaged pears showed slight wilt.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Shingo' pears were seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) film”
e3“non-packaged pears showed a slight wilt”
Claim · model-written summary
Decay occurrence did not differ significantly among the packaging treatments.
- Treatment
- seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) filme0
- Outcome
- Decay occurrencee4
- Direction
- not significantly differente4
- Comparator
- among the treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Shingo' pears were seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) film”
e4“Decay occurrence was not significantly different among the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Packaged pears had slightly more russet browning than non-packaged pears.
- Treatment
- packaged lotse5
- Outcome
- role browninge5
- Direction
- occurred a little moree5
- Comparator
- non-packaged lote5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Shingo' pears were seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) film”
e5“role browning occurred a little more in packaged lots than in non-packaged lot”
Claim · model-written summary
Pears from the 0.07mm-thick bag were rated highest in flavor, texture and juiciness.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“The sensory panel rated the pears front 0.07mm-thick bag highest in flavor, texture, and juiciness, which might be due to the high sugar content and low titratable acidity”
Claim · model-written summary
The sensory ratings of the 0.07mm-thick bag pears might be due to high sugar content and low titratable acidity.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“The sensory panel rated the pears front 0.07mm-thick bag highest in flavor, texture, and juiciness, which might be due to the high sugar content and low titratable acidity”
Claim · model-written summary
Firmness of pear flesh decreased during storage.
- Taxon
- pear
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60)
Pyrus communise7 - Treatment
- stogare timee7
- Outcome
- firmness of pear fleshe7
- Direction
- decreasede7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e7“The firmness of pear flesh decreased with the stogare time and its change was found to be highly correlated with that of cellulase activity (correlation coefficient= -0.946)”
Claim · model-written summary
Change in firmness was highly correlated with cellulase activity, correlation coefficient -0.946.
- Taxon
- pearPyrus communise7
- Gene
- cellulasee7
- Outcome
- firmness of pear fleshe7
- Value
- -0.946e7
- Qualifier
- correlation coefficiente7
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“The firmness of pear flesh decreased with the stogare time and its change was found to be highly correlated with that of cellulase activity (correlation coefficient= -0.946)”
Claim · model-written summary
Cellulase might be one of the enzymes responsible for softening of pear fruit during storage.
- Taxon
- pear fruitPyrus communise1
- Gene
- cellulasee1
- Outcome
- softening of pear fruite1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“cellulase might be one of the enzymes responsible for the softening of pear fruit during storage”
Claim · model-written summary
The atmosphere in polyethylene film bags was modified to 5-l4% oxygen with 3-5% carbon dioxide.
- Outcome
- atmosphere in PE film bagse2
- Value
- 5-l4% oxygen with 3-5% carbon dioxidee2
- Qualifier
- depending on the film thickness and the storage periode2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Shingo' pears were seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) film”
e2“The atmosphere in PE film bags was modified to 5-l4% oxygen with 3-5% carbon dioxide depending on the film thickness and the storage period”
Claim · model-written summary
Packaging gave good appearance of Shingo pears after storage.
- Treatment
- seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) filme0
- Outcome
- appearancee2
- Direction
- goode2
- Comparator
- non-packaged pearse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Shingo' pears were seal-packaged in polyethylene (PE) film”
e2“Packaging of pears with PE film effectively reduced the weight loss, which resulted in good appearance”
e3“non-packaged pears showed a slight wilt”
The same questions in other papers
storage · disease · Pyrus (pears)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.