Paper · 2014 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of green manures on the growth and yield of celeriac

ANDRZEJ BOROWY; MONIKA PODOLSKA; SALWINA PALONKA

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Blue lupine 200 kg · ha-1, and hairy vetch (80 kg · ha-1)-rye (120 kg · ha-1) mixture seeded at the beginning of August and cut and ploughed in the middle of November did not affect the yield of celeriac ‘Mentor’. The yield of celeriac plants with leaves and roots as well total and marketable yield of roots ‘Albin’ harvested on plots fertilized with a vetch-rye mixture was significantly higher than on plots fertilized with lupine and control plots. Green manures did not affect the content of nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium and magnesium in celeriac leaves. The effect of green manure on potassium content was dependent on cultivar and interaction between green manure and the cultivar. Roots developed by plants of both cultivars fertilized with green manures contained more dry matter than control ones. The content of crude fiber, L-ascorbic acid, monosaccharides and total sugars was independent on the cultivar and green manure fertilization. In July the growth of plants of both cultivars grown on plots fertilized with a vetch-rye mixture was more rapid than on other plots; however, at the end of the vegetation period the leaves of plants ‘Albin’ fertilized with a vetch-rye mixture were the shortest and the leaves of control plants ‘Mentor’ were the longest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue lupine and vetch-rye green manures did not affect celeriac yield (cultivar Mentor).

Material
Mentore1
Treatment
Blue lupine 200 kg · ha-1, and hairy vetch (80 kg · ha-1)-rye (120 kg · ha-1) mixturee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1
Comparator
control plotse2

Not reportedSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Blue lupine 200 kg · ha-1, and hairy vetch (80 kg · ha-1)-rye (120 kg · ha-1) mixture seeded at the beginning of August and cut and ploughed in the middle of November did not affect the yield of celeriac ‘Mentor’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–212 · show in text ↑
e2

“than on plots fertilized with lupine and control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch-rye green manure gave significantly higher celeriac plant yield (leaves and roots), total yield and marketable root yield in cultivar Albin than lupine and control.

Material
Albine1
Treatment
vetch-rye mixturee1
Outcome
yield of celeriac plants with leaves and roots as well total and marketable yield of rootse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
lupine and control plotse1

Not reportedSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The yield of celeriac plants with leaves and roots as well total and marketable yield of roots ‘Albin’ harvested on plots fertilized with a vetch-rye mixture was significantly higher than on plots fertilized with lupine and control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manures did not affect nitrogen, phosphorus and calcium content of celeriac leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
Green manurese1
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus, calciume1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Green manures did not affect the content of nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium and magnesium in celeriac leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manures did not affect magnesium content of celeriac leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
Green manurese1
Outcome
magnesiume1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Green manures did not affect the content of nitrogen, phosphorus, calcium and magnesium in celeriac leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–559 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of green manure on celeriac potassium content depended on cultivar and on the green manure x cultivar interaction.

Treatment
green manuree1
Outcome
potassium contente1

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The effect of green manure on potassium content was dependent on cultivar and interaction between green manure and the cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of green manures on the growth and yield of celeriac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots of celeriac plants of both cultivars fertilized with green manures had more dry matter than controls.

Organ / stage
Rootse1
Treatment
green manurese1
Outcome
dry mattere1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Roots developed by plants of both cultivars fertilized with green manures contained more dry matter than control ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of green manures on the growth and yield of celeriac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure fertilization did not change crude fiber, L-ascorbic acid and monosaccharide content of celeriac, independent of cultivar.

Treatment
green manure fertilizatione1
Outcome
content of crude fiber, L-ascorbic acid, monosaccharidese1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The content of crude fiber, L-ascorbic acid, monosaccharides and total sugars was independent on the cultivar and green manure fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of green manures on the growth and yield of celeriac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure fertilization did not change total sugar content of celeriac, independent of cultivar.

Treatment
green manure fertilizatione1
Outcome
total sugarse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The content of crude fiber, L-ascorbic acid, monosaccharides and total sugars was independent on the cultivar and green manure fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of green manures on the growth and yield of celeriac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch-rye green manure made celeriac growth in July more rapid than on other plots (both cultivars).

Treatment
vetch-rye mixturee1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
more rapide1
Comparator
other plotse1

Not reportedSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In July the growth of plants of both cultivars grown on plots fertilized with a vetch-rye mixture was more rapid than on other plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of green manures on the growth and yield of celeriac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of cultivar Albin fertilized with vetch-rye mixture were the shortest at the end of vegetation.

Material
Albine1
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
vetch-rye mixturee1
Outcome
leavese1
Direction
shorteste1

Not reportedComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“at the end of the vegetation period the leaves of plants ‘Albin’ fertilized with a vetch-rye mixture were the shortest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of green manures on the growth and yield of celeriac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of control plants of cultivar Mentor were the longest at the end of vegetation.

Material
Mentore1
Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
leavese1
Direction
longeste1

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group
Apium graveolens Rapaceum Group · Taxon · picture of the speciesMPF · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the leaves of control plants ‘Mentor’ were the longest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of green manures on the growth and yield of celeriac”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–59 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Apium graveolensPositive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.