Abstract
The performance of soyabean (cultivars JS 93-05 and JS 335) and pigeon pea under intercropping was evaluated in Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India, during 2007-08. The treatments consisted of: sole soyabean, with plants 30 cm apart; sole pigeon pea, with plants 60 cm apart; 2 rows of soyabean between 2 rows of pigeon pea (additive); 4 rows of soyabean followed by 2 rows of pigeon pea with a spacing of 30 cm (replacement); and 3 rows of soyabean in a skip of paired rows of pigeon pea (additive). Growth and yield parameters (plant height, number of nodules and pods per plant, number of branches and nodes per plant, number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant, test weight, biomass yield, grain yield and harvest index) were adversely affected when soyabean was intercropped with pigeon pea or when pigeon pea was intercropped with soyabean under the additive systems. However, under the replacement system, seed yield per plant in pigeon pea was increased by 11.9% compared to sole pigeon pea. Sole pigeon pea was superior to sole soyabean in terms of land equivalent ratio (LER), net profit and benefit cost ratio. All the intercropping systems registered higher soyabean equivalent yield and LER than sole cropping. The highest net profit (38 090 rupees/ha) and benefit:cost ratio (2.71) were obtained under soyabean and pigeon pea intercropping under the 3:2 additive system. JS 93-05 was more suitable for intercropping with pigeon pea than JS 335
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Growth and yield parameters of soyabean were adversely affected when intercropped with pigeon pea under additive systems.
- Taxon
- soyabeane0
- Treatment
- soyabean was intercropped with pigeon peae0
- Outcome
- Growth and yield parameterse0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yield parameters (plant height, number of nodules and pods per plant, number of branches and nodes per plant, number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant, test weight, biomass yield, grain yield and harvest index) were adversely affected when soyabean was intercropped with pigeon pea or when pigeon pea was intercropped with soyabean under the additive systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth and yield parameters of pigeon pea were adversely affected when intercropped with soyabean under additive systems.
- Taxon
- pigeon pea
Cajanus cajane0 - Treatment
- pigeon pea was intercropped with soyabean under the additive systemse0
- Outcome
- Growth and yield parameterse0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growth and yield parameters (plant height, number of nodules and pods per plant, number of branches and nodes per plant, number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant, test weight, biomass yield, grain yield and harvest index) were adversely affected when soyabean was intercropped with pigeon pea or when pigeon pea was intercropped with soyabean under the additive systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Under the replacement system, seed yield per plant of pigeon pea increased by 11.9% compared with sole pigeon pea.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- replacement systeme0
- Outcome
- seed yield per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 11.9%e0
- Comparator
- sole pigeon peae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under the replacement system, seed yield per plant in pigeon pea was increased by 11.9% compared to sole pigeon pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pigeon pea was superior to sole soyabean in land equivalent ratio, net profit and benefit cost ratio.
- Taxon
- pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
- Treatment
- Sole pigeon peae0
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratio (LER), net profit and benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- sole soyabeane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sole pigeon pea was superior to sole soyabean in terms of land equivalent ratio (LER), net profit and benefit cost ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
All intercropping systems gave higher soyabean equivalent yield and LER than sole cropping.
Verbatim
e0“All the intercropping systems registered higher soyabean equivalent yield and LER than sole cropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Soyabean and pigeon pea intercropping under the 3:2 additive system gave the highest net profit, 38 090 rupees/ha.
- Taxon
- soyabean and pigeon peae0
- Treatment
- soyabean and pigeon pea intercropping under the 3:2 additive systeme0
- Outcome
- net profite0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 38 090 rupees/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest net profit (38 090 rupees/ha) and benefit:cost ratio (2.71) were obtained under soyabean and pigeon pea intercropping under the 3:2 additive system”
Claim · model-written summary
Soyabean and pigeon pea intercropping under the 3:2 additive system gave the highest benefit:cost ratio, 2.71.
- Taxon
- soyabean and pigeon peae0
- Treatment
- soyabean and pigeon pea intercropping under the 3:2 additive systeme0
- Outcome
- benefit:cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.71e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest net profit (38 090 rupees/ha) and benefit:cost ratio (2.71) were obtained under soyabean and pigeon pea intercropping under the 3:2 additive system”
Claim · model-written summary
Soyabean cultivar JS 93-05 was more suitable for intercropping with pigeon pea than JS 335.
Verbatim
e0“JS 93-05 was more suitable for intercropping with pigeon pea than JS 335”
e1“soyabean (cultivars JS 93-05 and JS 335)”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
113 papers more in this group
See all 117 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.