Paper · 2009 · CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research)

Residual effect of plantain-targeted manure on substrate fertility and performance of follower maize (Zea mays) crop.

K. P. Baiyeri; A. Tenkouano; Suresh Babu. C

11
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fertilizer placement method plays a vital role in modulating crop response to nutrients. Previous studies found a split combination of top-dressing and base placement of poultry manure superior (on growth and dry matter yield of plantain) to either of the placement methods used singly. The present study investigated the effect of manure placement method vis-à-vis the duration of growth of a previous plantain crop on the substrate fertility (nutrient leftover) and growth of a follower maize crop. In a pot experiment, three manure application methods, consisting of top-dressing (T1), base placement (T2), or a split combination of methods T1 and T2 (T3), were tested against a no manure control (T4) on growth and dry matter yield of ‘PITA 14’ (a plantain hybrid) for a growth period of 3 or 5 months. The residual fertility of the leftover substrates was evaluated, based on growth and biomass production of two maize varieties (acid and non-acid tolerant) for 9 weeks. The acidity, organic matter and NPK contents of the substrates were determined. Data were collected on percentage seedling emergence and vigour, plant height, stem diameter, number of live leaves, leaf area, leaf area index (LAI) and dry weights of shoot and root components. The duration of growth of the previous plantain crop and the manure placement methods significantly (P < 0.05) influenced nutrient leftover and all the growth parameters of the follower maize crop. The acid tolerant maize variety generally performed better than the non-tolerant variety. Longer duration of growth of the previous plantain crop reduced residual NPK. Top dressed soil (T1) substrate previously cropped for three months supported maize plants that had the highest LAI (0.56) and total dry weight (2.39g) at 3 WAP. However, at 6 and 9 WAP, substrates with split combination of top-dressing and base placement (T3) supported the highest LAI and total dry matter yield of maize. T3 substrates also maintained the highest residual nutrients and an ideal pH (6.6) for plant growth. Irrespective of manure placement method, maize growth performances were better in substrates previously cropped for three months than those cropped for five months. Maize performance in soil amended with manure but not previously cropped (positive control) was not better than other manured substrates, particularly those cropped for 3 months. The quantity of residual K had the highest correlation coefficient with LAI and total dry weight of maize. The results implied that nutrient mining and associated soil impoverishment in plantain cultivation could be ameliorated through appropriate nutrient placement methods. A split combination of top-dressing with base placement of poultry manure in plantain fields ensures a slower but steadier availability of crop nutrients needed for better sustainability of crop yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prior plantain duration and manure placement significantly influenced nutrient leftover and maize growth parameters.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
manure placement methodse0
Outcome
all the growth parameters of the follower maize crope0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of growth of the previous plantain crop and the manure placement methods significantly (P < 0.05) influenced nutrient leftover and all the growth parameters of the follower maize crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1449 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid-tolerant maize generally performed better than the non-tolerant variety.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
acid tolerant maize varietye0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
non-tolerant varietye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The acid tolerant maize variety generally performed better than the non-tolerant variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer prior plantain growth reduced residual NPK.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Longer duration of growth of the previous plantain crope0
Outcome
residual NPKe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Longer duration of growth of the previous plantain crop reduced residual NPK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top-dressed substrate cropped for three months gave maize the highest LAI of 0.56 at 3 WAP.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Top dressed soil (T1) substrate previously cropped for three monthse0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.56e0
Qualifier
at 3 WAPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Top dressed soil (T1) substrate previously cropped for three months supported maize plants that had the highest LAI (0.56) and total dry weight (2.39g) at 3 WAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same substrate gave the highest maize total dry weight of 2.39g at 3 WAP.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Top dressed soil (T1) substrate previously cropped for three monthse0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.39ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Top dressed soil (T1) substrate previously cropped for three months supported maize plants that had the highest LAI (0.56) and total dry weight (2.39g) at 3 WAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 6 and 9 WAP, split-placement substrates supported the highest maize LAI and dry matter yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
split combination of top-dressing and base placement (T3)e0
Outcome
LAI and total dry matter yield of maizee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
at 6 and 9 WAPe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 6 and 9 WAP, substrates with split combination of top-dressing and base placement (T3) supported the highest LAI and total dry matter yield of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 substrates retained the highest residual nutrients and pH 6.6.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
T3 substratese0
Outcome
residual nutrientse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T3 substrates also maintained the highest residual nutrients and an ideal pH (6.6) for plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2042 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grew better in substrate previously cropped for three rather than five months.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
substrates previously cropped for three monthse0
Outcome
maize growth performancese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
those cropped for five monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize growth performances were better in substrates previously cropped for three months than those cropped for five months.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2084–2207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize performance in manured uncropped soil was not better than other manured substrates.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
soil amended with manure but not previously croppede0
Outcome
Maize performancee0
Direction
not bettere0
Comparator
other manured substratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize performance in soil amended with manure but not previously cropped (positive control) was not better than other manured substrates, particularly those cropped for 3 months.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2208–2386 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual K had the strongest correlation with maize LAI and total dry weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Compound
residual Ke0
Outcome
LAI and total dry weight of maizee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quantity of residual K had the highest correlation coefficient with LAI and total dry weight of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2387–2493 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended split top-dressing and base placement of poultry manure in plantain fields for steadier nutrient availability.

Taxon
plantainMusa ABB Groupe0
Treatment
split combination of top-dressing with base placement of poultry manuree0
Outcome
slower but steadier availability of crop nutrientse0

Verbatim

e0

“A split combination of top-dressing with base placement of poultry manure in plantain fields ensures a slower but steadier availability of crop nutrients needed for better sustainability of crop yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2663–2865 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 137 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

growing medium · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.