Paper · 2026 · Journal of Horticultural Research

Optimization of the D-Cryoplate Technique for Cryopreservation of Cannabis sativa Axillary Buds

Natalia Raquel Dolce; Silvia Cristina Schaller

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Long-term conservation of elite Cannabis sativa genotypes is essential to maintain genetic fidelity in clonal propagation systems. This study aimed to evaluate and optimize the D-cryoplate technique for cryopreservation of C. sativa axillary buds, with particular emphasis on the role of explant dehydration before cryostorage. Axillary buds from micropropagated plants of two cultivars were encapsulated in calcium alginate on aluminum cryoplates, osmotically pretreated, dehydrated for 0–90 minutes, and immersed in liquid nitrogen. After cryostorage, the explants were rapidly rewarmed, recovered in vitro, and subsequently acclimatized under greenhouse conditions. Shoot regeneration was strongly dependent on dehydration time, with the highest regeneration rates (63–70%) observed after 60–70 minutes of dehydration. These optimal times corresponded to capsule water content of 21–28%. Short dehydration periods resulted in low regeneration due to freezing injury, while excessive dehydration significantly reduced explant viability due to desiccation stress. Shoots regenerated from cryopreserved axillary buds showed typical morphological development with growth parameters comparable to those of the noncryopreserved control. These results demonstrate that precise control of explant water content is critical for successful cryopreservation, and the D-cryoplate technique is an efficient and chemically safe strategy for the long-term preservation of elite C. sativa clonal germplasm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest shoot regeneration rates (63-70%) were observed after 60-70 minutes of dehydration before cryostorage.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
60–70 minutes of dehydratione1
Outcome
regeneration ratese1
Direction
higheste1
Value
63–70%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot regeneration was strongly dependent on dehydration time, with the highest regeneration rates (63–70%) observed after 60–70 minutes of dehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–829 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal dehydration times corresponded to capsule water content of 21-28%.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Outcome
capsule water contente1
Value
21–28%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“These optimal times corresponded to capsule water content of 21–28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short dehydration periods resulted in low regeneration due to freezing injury.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
Short dehydration periodse1
Outcome
regeneratione1
Direction
lowe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Short dehydration periods resulted in low regeneration due to freezing injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive dehydration significantly reduced explant viability due to desiccation stress.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
excessive dehydratione1
Outcome
explant viabilitye1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“excessive dehydration significantly reduced explant viability due to desiccation stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoots regenerated from cryopreserved axillary buds showed typical morphological development with growth parameters comparable to the noncryopreserved control.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Treatment
cryopreserved axillary budse1
Outcome
growth parameterse1
Direction
comparablee1
Comparator
noncryopreserved controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoots regenerated from cryopreserved axillary buds showed typical morphological development with growth parameters comparable to those of the noncryopreserved control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1241 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that precise control of explant water content is critical for successful cryopreservation of C. sativa.

Taxon
Cannabis sativaCannabis sativat0
Outcome
precise control of explant water contente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cannabis sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“precise control of explant water content is critical for successful cryopreservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1358 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

in vitro · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.