Paper · 2026 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Species-level variation in cadmium phytoextraction efficiency and growth response of Brassica species inoculated with Bacillus strains

Sumbal Imdad; Mahwish Rabia; Asifa Farooqi; et al.

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Elevated cadmium (Cd) contamination in agricultural soils threatens ecological health and food security. This study evaluated synergistic potential of four Brassica species (Brassica juncea, Brassica carinata, Brassica napus, and Brassica rapa) combined with two Cd tolerant, plant growth-promoting (PGP) Bacillus strains (Bacillus tequilensis and Bacillus zhangzhouensis) for the restoration of Cd spiked soil. A 90-day pot experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design showed that Cd stress markedly reduced plant growth, while bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensis, significantly improved biomass, chlorophyll content, antioxidant activity, and reduced oxidative stress indicators (MDA, H2O2). Among species, B. napus demonstrated highest shoot and root biomass (18.89 g FW, 0.34 g DW, and 1.40 g FW, 0.21 g DW), and elevated Cd accumulation (BAF = 0.98, TF = 1.90). Phytoextraction efficiencies were graded as (1) B. napus (77%), (2) B. juncea (68%), (3) B. rapa (67%), and (4) B. carinata (62%). B. napus showed the highest phytoextraction efficiency, exceeding B. juncea, B. rapa, and B. carinata by 9%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. Soil enzymes and physicochemical properties improved with inoculation. These findings highlight B. napus inoculated with B. tequilensis as a viable option for restoring Cd-contaminated soils. Further, field scale validation is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced Brassica growth.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
Cd stresse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 90-day pot experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design showed that Cd stress markedly reduced plant growth, while bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensis, significantly improved biomass, chlorophyll content, antioxidant activity, and reduced oxidative stress indicators (MDA, H2O2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation, especially B. tequilensis, improved biomass.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensise0
Interactor
B. tequilensisBacillus tequilensise0symbiont
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 90-day pot experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design showed that Cd stress markedly reduced plant growth, while bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensis, significantly improved biomass, chlorophyll content, antioxidant activity, and reduced oxidative stress indicators (MDA, H2O2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation, especially B. tequilensis, improved chlorophyll content.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensise0
Interactor
B. tequilensisBacillus tequilensise0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 90-day pot experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design showed that Cd stress markedly reduced plant growth, while bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensis, significantly improved biomass, chlorophyll content, antioxidant activity, and reduced oxidative stress indicators (MDA, H2O2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation, especially B. tequilensis, improved antioxidant activity.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensise0
Interactor
B. tequilensisBacillus tequilensise0symbiont
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 90-day pot experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design showed that Cd stress markedly reduced plant growth, while bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensis, significantly improved biomass, chlorophyll content, antioxidant activity, and reduced oxidative stress indicators (MDA, H2O2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation, especially B. tequilensis, reduced oxidative stress indicators (MDA, H2O2).

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensise0
Interactor
B. tequilensisBacillus tequilensise0symbiont
Outcome
oxidative stress indicators (MDA, H2O2)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 90-day pot experiment arranged in a randomized complete block design showed that Cd stress markedly reduced plant growth, while bacterial inoculation particularly with B. tequilensis, significantly improved biomass, chlorophyll content, antioxidant activity, and reduced oxidative stress indicators (MDA, H2O2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus had highest biomass (18.89 g FW).

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.89 g FWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among species, B. napus demonstrated highest shoot and root biomass (18.89 g FW, 0.34 g DW, and 1.40 g FW, 0.21 g DW), and elevated Cd accumulation (BAF = 0.98, TF = 1.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus had highest biomass (0.34 g DW).

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.34 g DWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among species, B. napus demonstrated highest shoot and root biomass (18.89 g FW, 0.34 g DW, and 1.40 g FW, 0.21 g DW), and elevated Cd accumulation (BAF = 0.98, TF = 1.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus had highest root biomass (1.40 g FW).

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.40 g FWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among species, B. napus demonstrated highest shoot and root biomass (18.89 g FW, 0.34 g DW, and 1.40 g FW, 0.21 g DW), and elevated Cd accumulation (BAF = 0.98, TF = 1.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus had highest root biomass (0.21 g DW).

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.21 g DWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among species, B. napus demonstrated highest shoot and root biomass (18.89 g FW, 0.34 g DW, and 1.40 g FW, 0.21 g DW), and elevated Cd accumulation (BAF = 0.98, TF = 1.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus had elevated Cd accumulation (BAF = 0.98).

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
Cd accumulatione0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
BAF = 0.98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among species, B. napus demonstrated highest shoot and root biomass (18.89 g FW, 0.34 g DW, and 1.40 g FW, 0.21 g DW), and elevated Cd accumulation (BAF = 0.98, TF = 1.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus had elevated Cd accumulation (TF = 1.90).

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
Cd accumulatione0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
TF = 1.90e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among species, B. napus demonstrated highest shoot and root biomass (18.89 g FW, 0.34 g DW, and 1.40 g FW, 0.21 g DW), and elevated Cd accumulation (BAF = 0.98, TF = 1.90).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus had phytoextraction efficiency of 77%.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
Phytoextraction efficienciese0
Value
77%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytoextraction efficiencies were graded as (1) B. napus (77%), (2) B. juncea (68%), (3) B. rapa (67%), and (4) B. carinata (62%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. juncea had phytoextraction efficiency of 68%.

Taxon
B. junceaBrassica junceae0
Outcome
Phytoextraction efficienciese0
Value
68%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytoextraction efficiencies were graded as (1) B. napus (77%), (2) B. juncea (68%), (3) B. rapa (67%), and (4) B. carinata (62%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. rapa had phytoextraction efficiency of 67%.

Taxon
B. rapaBrassica rapae0
Outcome
Phytoextraction efficienciese0
Value
67%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytoextraction efficiencies were graded as (1) B. napus (77%), (2) B. juncea (68%), (3) B. rapa (67%), and (4) B. carinata (62%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. carinata had phytoextraction efficiency of 62%.

Taxon
B. carinataBrassica carinatae0
Outcome
Phytoextraction efficienciese0
Value
62%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytoextraction efficiencies were graded as (1) B. napus (77%), (2) B. juncea (68%), (3) B. rapa (67%), and (4) B. carinata (62%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus exceeded B. juncea in phytoextraction efficiency by 9%.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
phytoextraction efficiencye0
Direction
exceedinge0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
B. junceae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. napus showed the highest phytoextraction efficiency, exceeding B. juncea, B. rapa, and B. carinata by 9%, 10%, and 15%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus exceeded B. rapa in phytoextraction efficiency by 10%.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
phytoextraction efficiencye0
Direction
exceedinge0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
B. rapae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. napus showed the highest phytoextraction efficiency, exceeding B. juncea, B. rapa, and B. carinata by 9%, 10%, and 15%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. napus exceeded B. carinata in phytoextraction efficiency by 15%.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Outcome
phytoextraction efficiencye0
Direction
exceedinge0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
B. carinatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. napus showed the highest phytoextraction efficiency, exceeding B. juncea, B. rapa, and B. carinata by 9%, 10%, and 15%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation improved soil enzymes and physicochemical properties.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicat0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Soil enzymes and physicochemical propertiese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil enzymes and physicochemical properties improved with inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify B. napus inoculated with B. tequilensis as an option for restoring Cd-contaminated soil.

Taxon
B. napusBrassica napuse0
Treatment
inoculated with B. tequilensise0
Interactor
B. tequilensisBacillus tequilensise0symbiont
Outcome
restoring Cd-contaminated soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These findings highlight B. napus inoculated with B. tequilensis as a viable option for restoring Cd-contaminated soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1358 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · growth · BrassicaResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · BrassicaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

heavy metal · growth · BrassicaResults agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.