Abstract
In 2017–2019, in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland (50°40′42″ N, 23°47′35″ E), the effect of foliar application of various forms of silicon (calcium silicate—CS, sodium metasilicate—SM, and micronized silica—MS) and the timing of their application (at the 6-leaf stage of sugar beet, 7 and 14 days later) at single and double doses on physiological parameters, yield, and technological quality of sugar beet roots was studied. The silicon form significantly modified all assessed physiological parameters (NDVI, LAI, and PAR absorption) at all measurement dates. The application date had a significant effect on the assessed parameters at later measurement dates, while the product dose had essentially no effect. The silicon form significantly affected root yield and technological quality, with the exception of α-amino nitrogen content, biological sugar yield, and pure sugar yield. Foliar application of CS and SM resulted in the highest root yield, biological sugar yield, and pure sugar yield, as well as the highest sugar content and the lowest Na content in CS roots. The timing of foliar application significantly affected root yield, biological sugar yield, and α-amino N content. The highest root yield (88.53 t ha−1) and biological sugar yield (15.47 t ha−1) were achieved when the application was performed 14 days after the 6-leaf stage. Simultaneously, the technological quality of the roots deteriorated due to a significant increase in α-amino N content. Application of a double dose of the product significantly increased sugar content and decreased Na content in the roots.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
The silicon form significantly modified NDVI, LAI and PAR absorption at all measurement dates.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- silicon forme1
- Outcome
- NDVI, LAI, and PAR absorptione1
- Qualifier
- at all measurement datese1
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e1“The silicon form significantly modified all assessed physiological parameters (NDVI, LAI, and PAR absorption) at all measurement dates”
Claim · model-written summary
The application date had a significant effect on the physiological parameters at later measurement dates.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- application datee2
- Outcome
- assessed parameterse2
- Qualifier
- at later measurement datese2
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e2“The application date had a significant effect on the assessed parameters at later measurement dates, while the product dose had essentially no effect”
Claim · model-written summary
The product dose had essentially no effect on the physiological parameters.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- product dosee2
- Outcome
- assessed parameterse2
- Direction
- essentially no effecte2
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e2“The application date had a significant effect on the assessed parameters at later measurement dates, while the product dose had essentially no effect”
Claim · model-written summary
The silicon form significantly affected root yield and technological quality of sugar beet roots.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- silicon forme3
- Outcome
- root yield and technological qualitye3
- Qualifier
- with the exception of α-amino nitrogen content, biological sugar yield, and pure sugar yielde3
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e3“The silicon form significantly affected root yield and technological quality, with the exception of α-amino nitrogen content, biological sugar yield, and pure sugar yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application of CS and SM gave the highest root yield, biological sugar yield and pure sugar yield.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of CS and SMe4
- Outcome
- root yield, biological sugar yield, and pure sugar yielde4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e4“Foliar application of CS and SM resulted in the highest root yield, biological sugar yield, and pure sugar yield, as well as the highest sugar content and the lowest Na content in CS roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application of CS and SM gave the highest sugar content of sugar beet roots.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Foliar application of CS and SMe4
- Outcome
- sugar contente4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e4“Foliar application of CS and SM resulted in the highest root yield, biological sugar yield, and pure sugar yield, as well as the highest sugar content and the lowest Na content in CS roots”
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium silicate (CS) gave the lowest Na content in sugar beet roots.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- CSe4
- Outcome
- Na contente4
- Direction
- loweste4
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e4“Foliar application of CS and SM resulted in the highest root yield, biological sugar yield, and pure sugar yield, as well as the highest sugar content and the lowest Na content in CS roots”
Claim · model-written summary
The timing of foliar application significantly affected root yield, biological sugar yield and alpha-amino N content.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- timing of foliar applicatione5
- Outcome
- root yield, biological sugar yield, and α-amino N contente5
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e5“The timing of foliar application significantly affected root yield, biological sugar yield, and α-amino N content. The highest root yield (88.53 t ha−1) and biological sugar yield (15.47 t ha−1) were achieved when the application was performed 14 days after the 6-leaf stage. Simultaneously, the technological quality of the roots deteriorated due to a significant increase in α-amino N content”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest root yield, 88.53 t ha−1, was achieved when foliar application was made 14 days after the 6-leaf stage.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 14 days after the 6-leaf stagee5
- Outcome
- root yielde5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 88.53 t ha−1e5
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e5“The timing of foliar application significantly affected root yield, biological sugar yield, and α-amino N content. The highest root yield (88.53 t ha−1) and biological sugar yield (15.47 t ha−1) were achieved when the application was performed 14 days after the 6-leaf stage. Simultaneously, the technological quality of the roots deteriorated due to a significant increase in α-amino N content”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest biological sugar yield, 15.47 t ha−1, was achieved when foliar application was made 14 days after the 6-leaf stage.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 14 days after the 6-leaf stagee5
- Outcome
- biological sugar yielde5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 15.47 t ha−1e5
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e5“The timing of foliar application significantly affected root yield, biological sugar yield, and α-amino N content. The highest root yield (88.53 t ha−1) and biological sugar yield (15.47 t ha−1) were achieved when the application was performed 14 days after the 6-leaf stage. Simultaneously, the technological quality of the roots deteriorated due to a significant increase in α-amino N content”
Claim · model-written summary
Alpha-amino N content increased significantly when application was made 14 days after the 6-leaf stage.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 14 days after the 6-leaf stagee5
- Outcome
- α-amino N contente5
- Direction
- increasee5
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e5“The timing of foliar application significantly affected root yield, biological sugar yield, and α-amino N content. The highest root yield (88.53 t ha−1) and biological sugar yield (15.47 t ha−1) were achieved when the application was performed 14 days after the 6-leaf stage. Simultaneously, the technological quality of the roots deteriorated due to a significant increase in α-amino N content”
Claim · model-written summary
Technological quality of the roots deteriorated, associated with the increase in alpha-amino N content.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Compound
- α-amino N contente5
- Outcome
- technological quality of the rootse5
- Direction
- deterioratede5
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e5“The timing of foliar application significantly affected root yield, biological sugar yield, and α-amino N content. The highest root yield (88.53 t ha−1) and biological sugar yield (15.47 t ha−1) were achieved when the application was performed 14 days after the 6-leaf stage. Simultaneously, the technological quality of the roots deteriorated due to a significant increase in α-amino N content”
Claim · model-written summary
A double dose of the product significantly increased sugar content of the roots.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- a double dose of the producte6
- Outcome
- sugar contente6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e6“Application of a double dose of the product significantly increased sugar content and decreased Na content in the roots”
Claim · model-written summary
A double dose of the product significantly decreased Na content in the roots.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- a double dose of the producte6
- Outcome
- Na contente6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Setting
- Sahryń, Polande0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect on Sugar Beet Yield”
e0“in a field experiment in Sahryń, Poland”
e6“Application of a double dose of the product significantly increased sugar content and decreased Na content in the roots”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
63 papers more in this group
See all 67 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.