Paper · 2026 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Effects of insect-vectored viruses and vector management on alfalfa yield, quality, and virus prevalence

Apekshya Senchuri; Kaleigh B Wald; Alexander V Karasev; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied, but gaps remain in our understanding of the effects of insect-vectored viruses on yield and quality. Common alfalfa viruses transmitted by pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), include alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV, Alfamovirus), bean leafroll virus (BLRV, Polerovirus), and pea streak virus (PeSV, Carlavirus), but their yield effects are poorly understudied. In addition, the recent discovery of Snake River alfalfa virus (SRAV), which is widely distributed in alfalfa in the Northwest US, warrants investigation into its mode of transmission and possible effects on yield and quality. A 2-year field experiment compared a non-treated check versus a rotation of insecticides targeting pea aphids and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Although insecticides reduced aphid and thrips densities, yield did not differ between treatments, except for one cutting in 1 year that showed slightly higher yield in the check. Insecticide-treated plots generally had lower densities of beneficial insects, which might have contributed to this difference. Forage quality metrics showed no clear differences between treatments. Virus prevalence was similarly unaffected by treatment, though higher AMV and PeSV prevalence was observed in the second crop year. Greenhouse experiments indicated that western flower thrips is not a vector of SRAV. Nevertheless, the high prevalence of SRAV and of aphid-transmitted viruses in older alfalfa stands underscore the need for further study on virus effects on alfalfa yield and quality over longer time periods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide rotation reduced aphid and thrips densities in alfalfa compared with a non-treated check.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
rotation of insecticidese1
Interactor
pea aphidsAcyrthosiphon pisume1pest
Second interactor
western flower thripsFrankliniella occidentalise1pest
Outcome
aphid and thrips densitiese2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
non-treated checke1
Setting
fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Acyrthosiphon pisum
Acyrthosiphon pisum · InteractorShipher Wu (photograph) and Gee-way Lin (aphid provision), National Taiwan University · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Frankliniella occidentalis
Frankliniella occidentalis · Second interactorFrank Peairs, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 2-year field experiment compared a non-treated check versus a rotation of insecticides targeting pea aphids and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–941 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although insecticides reduced aphid and thrips densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield did not differ between insecticide-rotation and non-treated check treatments in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
rotation of insecticidese1
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
did not differe3
Comparator
non-treated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 2-year field experiment compared a non-treated check versus a rotation of insecticides targeting pea aphids and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–941 · show in text ↑
e3

“yield did not differ between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One cutting in one year yielded slightly more in the non-treated check than in the insecticide treatment.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
rotation of insecticidese1
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
one cutting in 1 yeare4
Comparator
checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 2-year field experiment compared a non-treated check versus a rotation of insecticides targeting pea aphids and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–941 · show in text ↑
e4

“except for one cutting in 1 year that showed slightly higher yield in the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide-treated plots generally had lower densities of beneficial insects than the non-treated check.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Insecticide-treated plotse5
Outcome
densities of beneficial insectse5
Direction
lowere5
Qualifier
might have contributed to this differencee5
Comparator
non-treated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 2-year field experiment compared a non-treated check versus a rotation of insecticides targeting pea aphids and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–941 · show in text ↑
e5

“Insecticide-treated plots generally had lower densities of beneficial insects, which might have contributed to this difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage quality metrics showed no clear differences between insecticide-rotation and non-treated check treatments.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
rotation of insecticidese1
Outcome
Forage quality metricse6
Direction
no clear differencese6
Comparator
non-treated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 2-year field experiment compared a non-treated check versus a rotation of insecticides targeting pea aphids and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–941 · show in text ↑
e6

“Forage quality metrics showed no clear differences between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus prevalence in alfalfa was unaffected by the insecticide treatment.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
rotation of insecticidese1
Outcome
Virus prevalencee7
Direction
unaffectede7
Comparator
non-treated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e1

“A 2-year field experiment compared a non-treated check versus a rotation of insecticides targeting pea aphids and western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–941 · show in text ↑
e7

“Virus prevalence was similarly unaffected by treatment, though higher AMV and PeSV prevalence was observed in the second crop year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1452 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMV and PeSV prevalence in alfalfa was higher in the second crop year.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
AMVe7pathogen
Second interactor
PeSVPea streak viruse7pathogen
Outcome
AMV and PeSV prevalencee7
Direction
highere7
Qualifier
in the second crop yeare7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e7

“Virus prevalence was similarly unaffected by treatment, though higher AMV and PeSV prevalence was observed in the second crop year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1452 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse experiments western flower thrips was not a vector of SRAV in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
western flower thripsFrankliniella occidentalise6pest
Second interactor
SRAVe6pathogen
Outcome
vector of SRAVe6
Setting
Greenhouse experimentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Frankliniella occidentalis
Frankliniella occidentalis · InteractorFrank Peairs, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e6

“Greenhouse experiments indicated that western flower thrips is not a vector of SRAV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRAV and aphid-transmitted viruses had a high prevalence in older alfalfa stands.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Interactor
SRAVe5pathogen
Outcome
prevalence of SRAV and of aphid-transmitted virusese5
Qualifier
in older alfalfa standse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Damage to alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. (Fabales: Fabaceae) from insect pests and microbial pathogens has been extensively studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–128 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nevertheless, the high prevalence of SRAV and of aphid-transmitted viruses in older alfalfa stands underscore the need for further study on virus effects on alfalfa yield and quality over longer time periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1746 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

insecticide · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

rotation · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

rotation · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

insecticide · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

insecticide · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · Acyrthosiphon pisum · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.