Paper · 2025 · Agrology

Productivity and forage quality of smooth brome and alfalfa in monocultures and crop mixture in semiarid climate

R. A. Vozhehova; S. P. Goloborodko; P. V. Lykhovyd; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract. Perennial grasses are vital for livestock feed and play a critical role in maintaining and enhancing soil fertility. This study evaluated the productivity of perennial grasses, specifically alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.), grown as monocultures and in a binary mixture, under rainfed conditions in a semiarid climate on dark-chestnut soil. The research aimed to elucidate the dynamics of formation of forage yield across multiple years of cultivation. The study was performed in the field trials with randomized design in four repetitions; the outcomes were analyzed through common analysis of variance with estimation of the Fisher’s least significant difference. The results revealed that the monocultures of smooth brome and alfalfa exhibited significantly lower yields (in terms of dry matter and feed units) compared with the alfalfa-brome mixture. Over the study period, the alfalfa’s initial dominance in the mixture gradually declined, with smooth brome becoming the dominant species by the end of the cultivation cycle. The forage quality, assessed according to crude protein and fat content, was highest in the alfalfa monoculture and the alfalfa-brome mixture, whereas the smooth brome monoculture was inferior. Although the smooth brome monoculture provided the lowest yields of feed units and digestible protein, they contributed essential crude fiber in the mixture, which supports healthy digestion in cattle. The alfalfa-brome mixture extracted the highest amount of nitrogen from the soil but, due to alfalfa’s nitrogen-fixing capacity, maintained sufficient nitrogen return to sustain soil fertility. By contrast, the smooth brome monoculture extracted the least nitrogen and did not contribute to soil nitrogen accumulation. The alfalfa monoculture exhibited the highest coefficient of nitrogen fixation, though the difference compared with the mixture was statistically non-significant. Consequently, the mixture of alfalfa and smooth brome, with varying dominance over the years of cultivation, enhances dark-chestnut soil fertility and provides balanced green fodder for cattle without requiring mineral nitrogen fertilizers or irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Smooth brome monocultures yielded significantly less dry matter and feed units than the alfalfa-brome mixture.

Taxon
smooth bromee1
Treatment
monoculturese1
Outcome
yields (in terms of dry matter and feed units)e1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
alfalfa-brome mixturee1

Verbatim

e1

“the monocultures of smooth brome and alfalfa exhibited significantly lower yields (in terms of dry matter and feed units) compared with the alfalfa-brome mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa monocultures yielded significantly less dry matter and feed units than the alfalfa-brome mixture.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
monoculturese1
Outcome
yields (in terms of dry matter and feed units)e1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
alfalfa-brome mixturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the monocultures of smooth brome and alfalfa exhibited significantly lower yields (in terms of dry matter and feed units) compared with the alfalfa-brome mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–900 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa dominance in the mixture declined over the study period, and smooth brome became the dominant species by the end of the cultivation cycle.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
initial dominance in the mixturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Over the study period, the alfalfa’s initial dominance in the mixture gradually declined, with smooth brome becoming the dominant species by the end of the cultivation cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage quality (crude protein and fat content) was highest in the alfalfa monoculture.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
alfalfa monoculturee1
Outcome
forage qualitye1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
assessed according to crude protein and fat contente1
Comparator
smooth brome monoculturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The forage quality, assessed according to crude protein and fat content, was highest in the alfalfa monoculture and the alfalfa-brome mixture, whereas the smooth brome monoculture was inferior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage quality (crude protein and fat content) was highest in the alfalfa-brome mixture.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
alfalfa-brome mixturee1
Outcome
forage qualitye1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
assessed according to crude protein and fat contente1
Comparator
smooth brome monoculturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The forage quality, assessed according to crude protein and fat content, was highest in the alfalfa monoculture and the alfalfa-brome mixture, whereas the smooth brome monoculture was inferior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage quality of the smooth brome monoculture was inferior to the alfalfa monoculture.

Taxon
smooth bromee1
Treatment
smooth brome monoculturee1
Outcome
forage qualitye1
Direction
inferiore1
Qualifier
assessed according to crude protein and fat contente1
Comparator
alfalfa monoculturee1

Verbatim

e1

“The forage quality, assessed according to crude protein and fat content, was highest in the alfalfa monoculture and the alfalfa-brome mixture, whereas the smooth brome monoculture was inferior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The smooth brome monoculture gave the lowest yields of feed units and digestible protein.

Taxon
smooth bromee1
Treatment
smooth brome monoculturee1
Outcome
yields of feed units and digestible proteine1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Although the smooth brome monoculture provided the lowest yields of feed units and digestible protein, they contributed essential crude fiber in the mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smooth brome contributed essential crude fiber in the alfalfa-brome mixture.

Taxon
smooth bromee1
Outcome
crude fibere1
Qualifier
in the mixturee1

Verbatim

e1

“Although the smooth brome monoculture provided the lowest yields of feed units and digestible protein, they contributed essential crude fiber in the mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The alfalfa-brome mixture extracted the highest amount of nitrogen from the soil.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
alfalfa-brome mixturee1
Outcome
amount of nitrogene1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The alfalfa-brome mixture extracted the highest amount of nitrogen from the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The smooth brome monoculture extracted the least nitrogen from the soil.

Taxon
smooth bromee1
Treatment
smooth brome monoculturee1
Outcome
nitrogene1
Direction
leaste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“By contrast, the smooth brome monoculture extracted the least nitrogen and did not contribute to soil nitrogen accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The smooth brome monoculture did not contribute to soil nitrogen accumulation.

Taxon
smooth bromee1
Treatment
smooth brome monoculturee1
Outcome
soil nitrogen accumulatione1
Direction
did not contributee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“By contrast, the smooth brome monoculture extracted the least nitrogen and did not contribute to soil nitrogen accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The alfalfa monoculture had the highest coefficient of nitrogen fixation, but the difference from the mixture was statistically non-significant.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
alfalfa monoculturee1
Outcome
coefficient of nitrogen fixatione1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
mixturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The alfalfa monoculture exhibited the highest coefficient of nitrogen fixation, though the difference compared with the mixture was statistically non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1953 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The alfalfa and smooth brome mixture, with varying dominance over the years, enhances dark-chestnut soil fertility and provides balanced green fodder for cattle without mineral nitrogen fertilizers or irrigation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
dark-chestnut soil fertilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Consequently, the mixture of alfalfa and smooth brome, with varying dominance over the years of cultivation, enhances dark-chestnut soil fertility and provides balanced green fodder for cattle without requiring mineral nitrogen fertilizers or irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2208 · show in text ↑

rotation · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

rotation · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.