Paper · 2026 · Journal of Cotton Research

Optimization of appropriate boron fertilization application range for two cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties in boron-deficient soils

Shanshan WANG; Cheng WANG; Yutian ZHANG; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Boron (B) constitutes a critical yield constraint in global cotton production. Although B application plays a vital role in cotton yield, research gaps persist regarding cultivar-specific B requirements, vertical canopy dynamics, and precision management protocols in B-deficient agroecosystems. Results In this study, we investigated the effects of B application rates on yield variation and spatial variation across two varieties at three locations. In Yancheng, applying 2.5 kg·hm −2 of boron resulted in yield increases of 14.7%–25.9%, and in Xinghua, applying 2.0 kg·hm −2 of boron achieved yield increases of 17.30%–20.58%. The optimal B application rates determined by quadratic function fitting were 1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2 of boron for CCRI 425 and 2.05–2.36 kg·hm −2 for Siza 3. Vertical canopy analysis revealed that the middle canopy (FB5–8), contributing 48.2% of total yield, responded significantly to B application rates. Conclusions Cultivar-tailored B application within 1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2 reconciles yield maximization. The boll number, especially those in the middle canopy, responded significantly to B application rates and was the main factor contributing to differences in yield formation. These findings underscore the necessity of location- and cultivar-specific B management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Yancheng, 2.5 kg·hm −2 boron increased cotton yield by 14.7%–25.9%.

Treatment
applying 2.5 kg·hm −2 of borone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
14.7%–25.9%e0
Setting
Yanchenge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Yancheng, applying 2.5 kg·hm −2 of boron resulted in yield increases of 14.7%–25.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Xinghua, 2.0 kg·hm −2 boron increased cotton yield by 17.30%–20.58%.

Treatment
applying 2.0 kg·hm −2 of borone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
17.30%–20.58%e0
Setting
Xinghuae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Xinghua, applying 2.0 kg·hm −2 of boron achieved yield increases of 17.30%–20.58%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Quadratic fitting estimated an optimal boron rate of 1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2 for CCRI 425.

Material
CCRI 425e0
Outcome
optimal B application ratese0
Value
1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal B application rates determined by quadratic function fitting were 1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2 of boron for CCRI 425”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Quadratic fitting estimated an optimal boron rate of 2.05–2.36 kg·hm −2 for Siza 3.

Material
Siza 3e0
Outcome
optimal B application ratese0
Value
2.05–2.36 kg·hm −2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal B application rates determined by quadratic function fitting were 1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2 of boron for CCRI 425 and 2.05–2.36 kg·hm −2 for Siza 3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The middle cotton canopy contributed 48.2% of total yield.

Organ / stage
middle canopy (FB5–8)e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Value
48.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the middle canopy (FB5–8), contributing 48.2% of total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle canopy yield responded significantly to boron application rates.

Organ / stage
middle canopy (FB5–8)e0
Treatment
B application ratese0
Outcome
total yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the middle canopy (FB5–8), contributing 48.2% of total yield, responded significantly to B application rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll number, especially in the middle canopy, responded significantly to boron application rates.

Organ / stage
middle canopye0
Treatment
B application ratese0
Outcome
boll numbere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The boll number, especially those in the middle canopy, responded significantly to B application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boll number was the main factor contributing to yield formation differences.

Organ / stage
bolle0
Outcome
differences in yield formatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The boll number, especially those in the middle canopy, responded significantly to B application rates and was the main factor contributing to differences in yield formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend cultivar-tailored boron application within 1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2 for yield maximization.

Outcome
Cultivar-tailored B application within 1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2e0
Value
1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar-tailored B application within 1.90–2.36 kg·hm −2 reconciles yield maximization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors emphasize location- and cultivar-specific boron management.

Outcome
location- and cultivar-specific B managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These findings underscore the necessity of location- and cultivar-specific B management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–104 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
    Boron deficiency reduced cotton yield by 11% compared with 2 kg ha −1 B.

    The synergistic effects of soil-applied boron and foliar-applied silicon on cotton fiber quality and yield · 2023 · compared with 2

    Same directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.