Paper · 2026 · Horticulturae

The Effect of DNA Methylation on the Depth of Peel Color in ‘Red Fuji’

Yucheng Liu; Jingyi Su; Wensheng Li

8
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Red pigmentation in apple peel significantly contributes to its commercial value, and bagging treatment contributes to enhancing red coloration in fruits. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying bagging-induced coloration remain largely unexplored. Through bagging treatment, this study aimed to investigate the role of DNA methylation in anthocyanin biosynthesis in the ‘Nagafu No. 2’ cultivar and its bud mutation variant, which has enhanced red coloration. We compared bagging and unbagging treatments in both the bud mutant (Mt-Bagging and Mt-NoBagging) and the wild type (Control-Bagging and Control-NoBagging). Our results demonstrated that bagging significantly promoted anthocyanin accumulation while reducing chlorophyll content. At 30 days post-bag removal, anthocyanin content was highest in the Mt-Bagging group, followed by the Mt-NoBagging, Control-Bagging, and Control-NoBagging groups, and the highest level of redness (a* values) was detected in the Mt-Bagging group. Genome-wide methylation analysis revealed that differentially methylated regions predominantly targeted structural genes within the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, including C4H1, C4H3, C4HL, ANS1, and ANS2. Notably, quantitative PCR analysis confirmed that the upregulation of C4HL, C4H3, and ANS1 in the bagged mutant correlated with its intensified red coloration. These findings offer novel insights into the epigenetic regulation of apple peel pigmentation during bagging cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging significantly increased anthocyanin accumulation.

Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
anthocyanin accumulatione0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
unbagginge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bagging significantly promoted anthocyanin accumulation while reducing chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peel Color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red pigmentation in apple peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“We compared bagging and unbagging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging reduced chlorophyll content.

Treatment
bagginge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
unbagginge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bagging significantly promoted anthocyanin accumulation while reducing chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peel Color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red pigmentation in apple peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“We compared bagging and unbagging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30 days after bag removal, anthocyanin was highest in the bagged mutant.

Material
Mt-Bagginge0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
30 days post-bag removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 30 days post-bag removal, anthocyanin content was highest in the Mt-Bagging group, followed by the Mt-NoBagging, Control-Bagging, and Control-NoBagging groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peel Color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red pigmentation in apple peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“We compared bagging and unbagging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bagged mutant had the highest peel redness.

Material
Mt-Bagginge0
Outcome
redness (a* values)e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest level of redness (a* values) was detected in the Mt-Bagging group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peel Color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red pigmentation in apple peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“We compared bagging and unbagging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentially methylated regions predominantly targeted anthocyanin pathway structural genes.

Gene
C4H1, C4H3, C4HL, ANS1, and ANS2e0
Outcome
differentially methylated regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differentially methylated regions predominantly targeted structural genes within the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, including C4H1, C4H3, C4HL, ANS1, and ANS2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peel Color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red pigmentation in apple peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“We compared bagging and unbagging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C4HL upregulation correlated with intensified red coloration in the bagged mutant.

Material
bagged mutante0
Gene
C4HLe0
Outcome
intensified red coloratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upregulation of C4HL, C4H3, and ANS1 in the bagged mutant correlated with its intensified red coloration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peel Color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red pigmentation in apple peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“We compared bagging and unbagging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C4H3 upregulation correlated with intensified red coloration in the bagged mutant.

Material
bagged mutante0
Gene
C4H3e0
Outcome
intensified red coloratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upregulation of C4HL, C4H3, and ANS1 in the bagged mutant correlated with its intensified red coloration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peel Color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red pigmentation in apple peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“We compared bagging and unbagging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ANS1 upregulation correlated with intensified red coloration in the bagged mutant.

Material
bagged mutante0
Gene
ANS1e0
Outcome
intensified red coloratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upregulation of C4HL, C4H3, and ANS1 in the bagged mutant correlated with its intensified red coloration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peel Color”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red pigmentation in apple peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“We compared bagging and unbagging treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

trap barrier · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.