Paper · 2026 · Plants

Optimizing Biodegradable Films with Varying Induction Periods to Enhance Rice Growth and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Youliang Zhang; Xiaoming Li; Kaican Zhu; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Polyethylene film (PE) mulching produces substantial “white pollution,” prompting the use of biodegradable film (BF) alternatives, yet their performance in rice systems on Northeast black soils is still uncertain. We compared three BFs with different induction periods (45 d, BF45; 60 d, BF60; 80 d, BF80), PE and a no-film control (CK) to quantify their effects on soil hydrothermal conditions, rice growth, yield, grain quality, irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) and soil C, N. Results showed that mulching increased soil temperature and soil moisture. Across the growing season, the mean soil temperature at the 0–5 cm depth under PE was 5.5% and 2.2–5.5% higher than that under CK and BFs, respectively. Specifically, compared with CK, PE increased grain yield by 31–77% and IWUE by 75–123%, while BFs improved yield by 25–73% and IWUE by 48–101%. PE only slightly outperformed BF80 in yield (by 2.3% in 2023 and 2.1% in 2024) but achieved higher IWUE (11.0–11.7%). Grain chalkiness and sensory scores under BFs were comparable to PE and better than CK. At 0–20 cm, PE increased SOC (2.3–6.8%) and the C/N ratio (0–0.8%) but reduced total nitrogen (TN) (2.7–3.9%) and total carbon (TC) (2.5–3.1%), whereas BFs increased Org-N by 0.4–4.2%, SOC by 2.9–7.1%, and TN by 0.2–0.7%, with BF80 showing the greatest stimulatory effect. Overall, BFs—particularly BF80—are promising substitutes for PE in black soil rice systems, supporting sustainable rice production with strong application potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased soil temperature and soil moisture.

Treatment
mulchinge0
Outcome
soil temperature and soil moisturee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mulching increased soil temperature and soil moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE raised mean soil temperature at 0–5 cm by 5.5% relative to CK.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
mean soil temperaturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.5%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean soil temperature at the 0–5 cm depth under PE was 5.5% and 2.2–5.5% higher than that under CK and BFs, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE raised mean soil temperature at 0–5 cm by 2.2–5.5% relative to BFs.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
mean soil temperaturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.2–5.5%e0
Comparator
BFse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean soil temperature at the 0–5 cm depth under PE was 5.5% and 2.2–5.5% higher than that under CK and BFs, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE increased grain yield by 31–77% relative to CK.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31–77%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with CK, PE increased grain yield by 31–77% and IWUE by 75–123%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE increased IWUE by 75–123% relative to CK.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
IWUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
75–123%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with CK, PE increased grain yield by 31–77% and IWUE by 75–123%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BFs improved yield by 25–73% relative to CK.

Treatment
BFse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
25–73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BFs improved yield by 25–73% and IWUE by 48–101%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BFs improved IWUE by 48–101% relative to CK.

Treatment
BFse0
Outcome
IWUEe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
48–101%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BFs improved yield by 25–73% and IWUE by 48–101%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE yield exceeded BF80 yield by 2.3% in 2023 and 2.1% in 2024.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
outperformede0
Value
2.3% in 2023 and 2.1% in 2024e0
Comparator
BF80e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PE only slightly outperformed BF80 in yield (by 2.3% in 2023 and 2.1% in 2024)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE achieved 11.0–11.7% higher IWUE than BF80.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
IWUEe0
Direction
highere0
Value
11.0–11.7%e0
Comparator
BF80e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PE only slightly outperformed BF80 in yield (by 2.3% in 2023 and 2.1% in 2024) but achieved higher IWUE (11.0–11.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BFs produced grain chalkiness and sensory scores comparable to PE and better than CK.

Treatment
BFse0
Outcome
Grain chalkiness and sensory scorese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain chalkiness and sensory scores under BFs were comparable to PE and better than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE increased SOC by 2.3–6.8% at 0–20 cm.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.3–6.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 0–20 cm, PE increased SOC (2.3–6.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE increased the C/N ratio by 0–0.8% at 0–20 cm.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
C/N ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0–0.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PE increased SOC (2.3–6.8%) and the C/N ratio (0–0.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE reduced total nitrogen by 2.7–3.9%.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
total nitrogene0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.7–3.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PE increased SOC (2.3–6.8%) and the C/N ratio (0–0.8%) but reduced total nitrogen (TN) (2.7–3.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PE reduced total carbon by 2.5–3.1%.

Treatment
PEe0
Outcome
total carbone0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.5–3.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PE increased SOC (2.3–6.8%) and the C/N ratio (0–0.8%) but reduced total nitrogen (TN) (2.7–3.9%) and total carbon (TC) (2.5–3.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BFs increased Org-N by 0.4–4.2%.

Treatment
BFse0
Outcome
Org-Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.4–4.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BFs increased Org-N by 0.4–4.2%, SOC by 2.9–7.1%, and TN by 0.2–0.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BFs increased SOC by 2.9–7.1%.

Treatment
BFse0
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.9–7.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BFs increased Org-N by 0.4–4.2%, SOC by 2.9–7.1%, and TN by 0.2–0.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BFs increased TN by 0.2–0.7%.

Treatment
BFse0
Outcome
TNe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.2–0.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BFs increased Org-N by 0.4–4.2%, SOC by 2.9–7.1%, and TN by 0.2–0.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BF80 showed the greatest stimulatory effect on soil C and N.

Treatment
BF80e0
Outcome
greatest stimulatory effecte0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with BF80 showing the greatest stimulatory effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1334 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify BFs, particularly BF80, as promising PE substitutes in black soil rice systems.

Treatment
BFse0
Outcome
promising substitutes for PE in black soil rice systemse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BFs—particularly BF80—are promising substitutes for PE in black soil rice systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
    Mulching reduced rice yield by 43% in one of four comparisons with burning.

    Effect of residue management and fallow length on weeds and rice yield · 1998 · compared with farmers' traditional burning of crop and weed residues

    Opposite direction

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

mulching · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.