Paper · 2026 · Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology

Cost–Benefit Analysis of Onion Production under Integrated Crop Management Practices through Application of Conventional and Nano Fertilizer in Dharwad District, Karnataka, India

D K Harish; S G Angadi; S M Hiremath; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nano-agriculture has emerged as a promising approach to modern farming. Nano-formulations, particularly nano-fertilizers, enable targeted delivery of nutrients, reduce the required input doses, and enhance nutrient use efficiency. These nano-technologies also contribute to increased stress tolerance, improved plant immune responses, and better crop performance, making them a viable alternative to conventional fertilizers. The present study aimed to assess the costs and returns associated with varying levels of conventional and nano-fertilizer applications. A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif seasons of 2022 and 2023 at the All India Network Research Project on Onion and Garlic, UAS, Dharwad, to evaluate the economic performance of onion (Allium cepa) cultivation under Integrated Crop Management (ICM) practices with a special emphasis on Nano fertilizers. Thirteen treatments involving combinations of conventional fertilizers, secondary and micronutrients, and Nano formulations were assessed for their impact on cost of cultivation, gross and net returns, and benefit-cost (B:C) ratios. Results showed that treatments incorporating Nano fertilizers—particularly T11 (Nano-Zn + Nano-Fe + Boron + Sulphur) and T12 (Vegetable special)—consistently delivered higher economic returns and profitability, achieving the highest net returns (₹325,705 and ₹317,132, respectively) and B:C ratios (2.99). In contrast, conventional high-input treatments like T5 incurred the highest costs without proportionate returns, while the absolute control (T13) had the lowest costs and returns, resulting in the least profitability. The study highlights the effectiveness of Nano fertilizers in improving nutrient use efficiency, reducing input costs, and supporting sustainable and profitable onion production. These findings support a strategic shift toward integrated nutrient management by combining reduced conventional inputs with targeted Nano interventions. The study results advocate for a paradigm shift toward input-optimized, environmentally sound practices in onion production, offering a promising path toward resilient and sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 produced the highest onion net return of ₹325,705.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
T11 (Nano-Zn + Nano-Fe + Boron + Sulphur)e1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
₹325,705e1

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa) cultivation under Integrated Crop Management (ICM) practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“T11 (Nano-Zn + Nano-Fe + Boron + Sulphur) and T12 (Vegetable special)—consistently delivered higher economic returns and profitability, achieving the highest net returns (₹325,705 and ₹317,132, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 produced an onion net return of ₹317,132 among the highest returns.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
T12 (Vegetable special)e1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
₹317,132e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa) cultivation under Integrated Crop Management (ICM) practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 (Vegetable special)—consistently delivered higher economic returns and profitability, achieving the highest net returns (₹325,705 and ₹317,132, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported highest benefit to cost ratio for T11 was 2.99.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
T11 (Nano-Zn + Nano-Fe + Boron + Sulphur)e1
Outcome
B:C ratiose1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.99e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa) cultivation under Integrated Crop Management (ICM) practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“T11 (Nano-Zn + Nano-Fe + Boron + Sulphur) and T12 (Vegetable special)—consistently delivered higher economic returns and profitability, achieving the highest net returns (₹325,705 and ₹317,132, respectively) and B:C ratios (2.99)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reported highest benefit to cost ratio for T12 was 2.99.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
T12 (Vegetable special)e1
Outcome
B:C ratiose1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.99e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa) cultivation under Integrated Crop Management (ICM) practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 (Vegetable special)—consistently delivered higher economic returns and profitability, achieving the highest net returns (₹325,705 and ₹317,132, respectively) and B:C ratios (2.99)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1419 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 incurred the highest costs without proportionate returns.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T5e0
Outcome
highest costs without proportionate returnse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“conventional high-input treatments like T5 incurred the highest costs without proportionate returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1533 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The absolute control T13 had the lowest costs.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T13e0
Outcome
costse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“the absolute control (T13) had the lowest costs and returns, resulting in the least profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1638 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The absolute control T13 had the lowest returns and least profitability.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T13e0
Outcome
returns, resulting in the least profitabilitye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“the absolute control (T13) had the lowest costs and returns, resulting in the least profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1638 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advocate combining reduced conventional inputs with targeted Nano interventions for onion production.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Outcome
integrated nutrient management by combining reduced conventional inputs with targeted Nano interventionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“These findings support a strategic shift toward integrated nutrient management by combining reduced conventional inputs with targeted Nano interventions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1971 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

boron atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    FYM, NPK and sulfur, with or without boron and zinc, gave maximum bulb weight.

    Response of Onion to NPK, S and Micronutrients · 2020

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.