Paper · 2013 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of sulphur nutrition on pungency and storage life of short day onion (Allium cepa)

A. Thangasamy; V. Sankar; K. E. Lawande

15
claims
27
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to evaluate the effect of sulphur nutrition at 0, 7.5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 kg S/ha on pyruvic acid and storage life of onion bulbs in Vertic Haplustepts. Besides that, the effect of sulphur nutrition on soil available sulphur level, marketable bulb yield and sulphur uptake were also assessed. The results of this study revealed that sulphur application increased marketable bulb yield, sulphur uptake and pungency level over no sulphur treatment. Moreover the increase in bulb yield and sulphur uptake was less with increasing the sulphur level beyond 20 kg/ ha. The pyruvic acid content had significant and positive correlation with sulphur application (r 2 =0.735**). Sulphur application did not influence the storage life of onion bulbs significantly and showed no significant correlation with total storage losses of onion bulbs (r 2 = -0.0828). Soil sulphur level after harvest was increased over the initial values with application of sulphur @ 30, 40 and 50 kg S/ha while application of 7.5 kg S/ha and control without sulphur reduced soil available sulphur content. From this study, we conclude that sulfur nutrition is essential for increasing the onion yield and pungency level in soils having sufficient sulphur. However, excess sulphur application did not influence the yield and pungency level significantly. The storage life of onion bulbs were not influenced significantly by sulphur nutrition and application of either low or higher sulphur is detrimental to soil health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application increased marketable onion bulb yield over no sulphur.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
marketable bulb yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no sulphur treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulphur application increased marketable bulb yield, sulphur uptake and pungency level over no sulphur treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application increased onion sulphur uptake.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
sulphur uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no sulphur treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulphur application increased marketable bulb yield, sulphur uptake and pungency level over no sulphur treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application increased onion pungency.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
pungency levele0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no sulphur treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“sulphur application increased marketable bulb yield, sulphur uptake and pungency level over no sulphur treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–483 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield gains became smaller above 20 kg/ ha sulphur.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur levele0
Outcome
increase in bulb yielde0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
beyond 20 kg/ hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“the increase in bulb yield and sulphur uptake was less with increasing the sulphur level beyond 20 kg/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–599 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur uptake gains became smaller above 20 kg/ ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur levele0
Outcome
sulphur uptakee0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
beyond 20 kg/ hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“the increase in bulb yield and sulphur uptake was less with increasing the sulphur level beyond 20 kg/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–599 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyruvic acid content correlated positively and significantly with sulphur application.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
pyruvic acid contente0
Direction
positive correlatione0
Value
r 2 =0.735**e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pyruvic acid content had significant and positive correlation with sulphur application (r 2 =0.735**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application did not significantly influence onion bulb storage life.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
storage life of onion bulbse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur application did not influence the storage life of onion bulbs significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–791 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application had no significant correlation with bulb storage losses.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
total storage losses of onion bulbse0
Direction
no significant correlatione0
Value
r 2 = -0.0828e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed no significant correlation with total storage losses of onion bulbs (r 2 = -0.0828)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil sulphur after harvest increased from initial levels at 30, 40, and 50 kg S/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
application of sulphur @ 30, 40 and 50 kg S/hae0
Outcome
Soil sulphur level after harveste0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil sulphur level after harvest was increased over the initial values with application of sulphur @ 30, 40 and 50 kg S/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available sulphur decreased with 7.5 kg S/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
application of 7.5 kg S/hae0
Outcome
soil available sulphur contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of 7.5 kg S/ha and control without sulphur reduced soil available sulphur content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available sulphur decreased in the no sulphur control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
control without sulphure0
Outcome
soil available sulphur contente0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“control without sulphur reduced soil available sulphur content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess sulphur did not significantly influence yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
excess sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“excess sulphur application did not influence the yield and pungency level significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1358 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess sulphur did not significantly influence pungency.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
excess sulphur applicatione0
Outcome
pungency levele0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“excess sulphur application did not influence the yield and pungency level significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1358 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude sulphur nutrition is essential for onion yield and pungency in soils with sufficient sulphur.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
increasing the onion yield and pungency levele0
Qualifier
soils having sufficient sulphure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfur nutrition is essential for increasing the onion yield and pungency level in soils having sufficient sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1260 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors caution that low or high sulphur application harms soil health.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
either low or higher sulphure0
Outcome
detrimental to soil healthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of either low or higher sulphur is detrimental to soil health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1524 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.