Paper · 2026 · Scientific Reports

Comparison of multi-stress resilience in wild and domesticated Cowpea

Emiel De Meyer; Fien Van Cauter; Filip Vandelook; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A common hypothesis in plant science is that wild relatives of crops possess greater resilience to multiple stresses because they retain adaptive traits that have been diminished through domestication. Such reductions in resilience in cultivated crops are often attributed to trade-offs, whereby selection for agronomic performance decreases investment in stress tolerance. Alternatively, weakened multi-stress resilience may arise from relaxed natural selection in managed environments, where crops experience fewer ecological pressures. Vigna unguiculata, cowpea, is crucial for food security in arid and semi-arid regions due to its inherent stress tolerance, low input requirements, and nitrogen-fixing capacity. To test whether wild cowpea genotypes exhibit stronger multi-stress resilience than cultivated forms, we conducted a controlled full-factorial experiment using geographically and genetically diverse germplasm. Fourteen wild and cultivated genotypes spanning gradients in temperature, precipitation, and dry-season length were exposed to simulated drought and herbivory. We quantified growth responses and assessed trait variability using the coefficient of variation. Drought, herbivory, and their interaction significantly reduced productivity across all Vigna genotypes. However, wild types exhibited lower phenotypic variability and more consistent performance across stress treatments, suggesting that domestication may have reduced the stability of multi-stress responses. These findings improve our understanding of stress adaptation in cowpea and highlight the value of wild germplasm for breeding climate-resilient legumes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced productivity across all Vigna genotypes.

Treatment
Droughte1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Drought, herbivory, and their interaction significantly reduced productivity across all Vigna genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparison of multi-stress resilience in wild and domesticated Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbivory reduced productivity across all Vigna genotypes.

Treatment
herbivorye1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Drought, herbivory, and their interaction significantly reduced productivity across all Vigna genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparison of multi-stress resilience in wild and domesticated Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of drought and herbivory reduced productivity across all Vigna genotypes.

Treatment
their interactione1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Drought, herbivory, and their interaction significantly reduced productivity across all Vigna genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparison of multi-stress resilience in wild and domesticated Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild cowpea types showed lower phenotypic variability and more consistent performance across stress treatments.

Material
wild typese2
Outcome
phenotypic variabilitye2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
more consistent performance across stress treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“wild types exhibited lower phenotypic variability and more consistent performance across stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparison of multi-stress resilience in wild and domesticated Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Domestication may have reduced the stability of multi-stress responses.

Outcome
stability of multi-stress responsese3
Qualifier
domesticatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“suggesting that domestication may have reduced the stability of multi-stress responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparison of multi-stress resilience in wild and domesticated Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend using wild germplasm for breeding climate-resilient legumes.

Outcome
wild germplasm for breeding climate-resilient legumese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“highlight the value of wild germplasm for breeding climate-resilient legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparison of multi-stress resilience in wild and domesticated Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

46 papers: 7 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

grazing · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.