Abstract
An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region. The improved varieties with agrotechniques enhanced the productivity of cereals, pulses, oilseeds and vegetables by 114–240, 80–167, 72–134 and 60 - 206 %, respectively over farmers practice. Similarly, the productivity of fodder sorghum, cowpea and Guar increased by 197, 221 and 187%, respectively while the corresponding increase in Berseem and oat fodder yield was 265 and 115%. This enhanced the milk productivity of cows and buffaloes by 1.5 to 3 litresday−1 animal−1. The green fodder yield of stylo in silvipasture and hortipasture was 250–300 and 275–350 q ha−1 year−1, respectively. The ber top working with improved varieties produced 30–50 kg ber tree1 with improved size and quality and also generated additional income of ₹ 2000–5000 year−1 farmer−1. The supplementation of leaf meal in ration enhanced the body weight gain in goat by 9–12 g day 1 goat1 and milk production in buffaloes by 0.8–1.1 litre day 1 buffalo 1 compared to farmers practice of feeding. The introduction of improved farm machinery and drudgery reducing tools resulted into economic benefit to farmers and saved time for farmers and farm women. The capacity building activities improved the technical knowledge and skill of farmers. The living standard was improved by increasing the income of farmers due to adoption of improved agrotechniques.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Improved varieties with agrotechniques raised cereal productivity by 114–240% over farmers practice in Bundelkhand.
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e1“The improved varieties with agrotechniques enhanced the productivity of cereals, pulses, oilseeds and vegetables by 114–240, 80–167, 72–134 and 60 - 206 %, respectively over farmers practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved varieties with agrotechniques raised pulse productivity by 80–167% over farmers practice in Bundelkhand.
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e1“The improved varieties with agrotechniques enhanced the productivity of cereals, pulses, oilseeds and vegetables by 114–240, 80–167, 72–134 and 60 - 206 %, respectively over farmers practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved varieties with agrotechniques raised oilseed productivity by 72–134% over farmers practice in Bundelkhand.
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e1“The improved varieties with agrotechniques enhanced the productivity of cereals, pulses, oilseeds and vegetables by 114–240, 80–167, 72–134 and 60 - 206 %, respectively over farmers practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Improved varieties with agrotechniques raised vegetable productivity by 60–206% over farmers practice in Bundelkhand.
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e1“The improved varieties with agrotechniques enhanced the productivity of cereals, pulses, oilseeds and vegetables by 114–240, 80–167, 72–134 and 60 - 206 %, respectively over farmers practice”
Claim · model-written summary
Productivity of fodder sorghum increased by 197% under the interventions in Bundelkhand.
- Taxon
- fodder sorghume2
- Treatment
- crops and livestock based interventionse0
- Outcome
- productivitye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 197e2
- Setting
- Bundelkhand regione0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e2“the productivity of fodder sorghum, cowpea and Guar increased by 197, 221 and 187%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Productivity of cowpea increased by 221% under the interventions in Bundelkhand.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae2 - Treatment
- crops and livestock based interventionse0
- Outcome
- productivitye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 221e2
- Setting
- Bundelkhand regione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e2“the productivity of fodder sorghum, cowpea and Guar increased by 197, 221 and 187%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Productivity of guar increased by 187% under the interventions in Bundelkhand.
- Taxon
- Guar
Cyamopsis tetragonolobae2 - Treatment
- crops and livestock based interventionse0
- Outcome
- productivitye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 187e2
- Setting
- Bundelkhand regione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e2“the productivity of fodder sorghum, cowpea and Guar increased by 197, 221 and 187%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Berseem fodder yield increased by 265% under the interventions in Bundelkhand.
- Taxon
- Berseeme3
- Treatment
- crops and livestock based interventionse0
- Outcome
- fodder yielde3
- Direction
- increasee3
- Value
- 265e3
- Setting
- Bundelkhand regione0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e3“the corresponding increase in Berseem and oat fodder yield was 265 and 115%”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat fodder yield increased by 115% under the interventions in Bundelkhand.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativae3 - Treatment
- crops and livestock based interventionse0
- Outcome
- fodder yielde3
- Direction
- increasee3
- Value
- 115e3
- Setting
- Bundelkhand regione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An on-farm study was conducted during 2007–2012 to know the impact of various crops and livestock based interventions on sustainable improvement of productivity of farmers in Bundelkhand region”
e3“the corresponding increase in Berseem and oat fodder yield was 265 and 115%”
Claim · model-written summary
Green fodder yield of stylo in silvipasture was 250–300 q ha−1 year−1.
- Taxon
- stylo
.jpg?width=60)
Stylosanthes guianensise4 - Outcome
- green fodder yielde4
- Value
- 250–300e4
- Setting
- silvipasturee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e4“The green fodder yield of stylo in silvipasture and hortipasture was 250–300 and 275–350 q ha−1 year−1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Green fodder yield of stylo in hortipasture was 275–350 q ha−1 year−1.
- Taxon
- styloStylosanthes guianensise4
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde4
- Value
- 275–350e4
- Setting
- hortipasturee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The green fodder yield of stylo in silvipasture and hortipasture was 250–300 and 275–350 q ha−1 year−1, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Ber top working with improved varieties produced 30–50 kg ber per tree.
- Taxon
- ber
Ziziphus mauritianae5 - Treatment
- ber top working with improved varietiese5
- Outcome
- producede5
- Value
- 30–50 kg ber tree1e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The ber top working with improved varieties produced 30–50 kg ber tree1 with improved size and quality and also generated additional income of ₹ 2000–5000 year−1 farmer−1”
Claim · model-written summary
Ber top working with improved varieties gave ber fruit with improved size and quality.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianae5
- Treatment
- ber top working with improved varietiese5
- Outcome
- size and qualitye5
- Direction
- improvede5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The ber top working with improved varieties produced 30–50 kg ber tree1 with improved size and quality and also generated additional income of ₹ 2000–5000 year−1 farmer−1”
Claim · model-written summary
Ber top working with improved varieties generated additional income of ₹ 2000–5000 per farmer per year.
- Taxon
- berZiziphus mauritianae5
- Treatment
- ber top working with improved varietiese5
- Outcome
- additional incomee5
- Value
- ₹ 2000–5000 year−1 farmer−1e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The ber top working with improved varieties produced 30–50 kg ber tree1 with improved size and quality and also generated additional income of ₹ 2000–5000 year−1 farmer−1”
The same questions in other papers
grazing · yield · SorghumResults differ
3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
grazing · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
grazing · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.