Paper · 2024 · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)

Conversion from conventional tillage to no-tillage: effects on soil chemical properties and corn production preparo convencional convertido para semeadura direta: efeitos nos atributos químicos do solo e no milho

Piva B.-H.N.D.; Bertol I.; Santos D.N.; et al.

4
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

© 2024, Asociacion Argentina de la Ciencia del Suelo. All rights reserved.This research aimed to evaluate the changes in the soil chemical attributes and their effects on the agronomic attributes of corn, after conversion from conventional tillage (PC) to no-tillage (SD), in a Inceptisol soil (Cambissolo Húmico alumínico léptico). In an experiment where PC and SD effects had been studied for 20 yr, main plots under PC were converted to SD and referred to as implemented SD (SDi) while plots under SD remained unaltered and were referred to as consolidated NT (SDc). The pH in water, exchangeable aluminum, potassium, calcium, and magnesium, extractable phosphorus, and total organic carbon (COT), were determined at the beginning of the experiment and after a 30-month period. The agronomic attributes of corn grown under SDi and SDc were also evaluated. At the end of the experiment, plots under SDi evidenced an increase in exchangeable aluminum and potassium and COT, and a decrease in pH and exchangeable calcium. Corn biomass accumulation in shoots and roots increased and higher grain yields were observed under SDc compared to SDi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Converting plots from conventional tillage to no-tillage (SDi) increased exchangeable aluminum, potassium and total organic carbon in the soil.

Treatment
converted to SDe2
Outcome
exchangeable aluminum and potassium and COTe1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
plots under PCe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“plots under SDi evidenced an increase in exchangeable aluminum and potassium and COT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–973 · show in text ↑
e2

“main plots under PC were converted to SD and referred to as implemented SD (SDi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Converting plots from conventional tillage to no-tillage (SDi) decreased soil pH and exchangeable calcium.

Treatment
converted to SDe2
Outcome
pH and exchangeable calciume3
Direction
decreasee3
Comparator
plots under PCe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“main plots under PC were converted to SD and referred to as implemented SD (SDi)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–482 · show in text ↑
e3

“a decrease in pH and exchangeable calcium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn biomass accumulation in shoots and roots increased under consolidated no-tillage (SDc) compared with SDi.

Treatment
consolidated NT (SDc)e6
Outcome
biomass accumulation in shoots and rootse4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
SDie5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
e4

“Corn biomass accumulation in shoots and roots increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1077 · show in text ↑
e5

“higher grain yields were observed under SDc compared to SDi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1141 · show in text ↑
e6

“plots under SD remained unaltered and were referred to as consolidated NT (SDc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yields were higher under consolidated no-tillage (SDc) than under SDi.

Treatment
consolidated NT (SDc)e6
Outcome
grain yieldse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
SDie5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–107 · show in text ↑
e5

“higher grain yields were observed under SDc compared to SDi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1141 · show in text ↑
e6

“plots under SD remained unaltered and were referred to as consolidated NT (SDc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–568 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.