Paper · 2024 · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)

Agronomic response of the cowpea and soil quality bioindicators to the application of biochar

Daniele de Resende Ferreira, Kamila; Clara Santos Duarte, Ana; Nicson Lopes Pena, Arlen; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biochar can favor the production of agricultural crops and soil quality, but its characteristics depend on the residue used and its effects may vary according to the cultivated species. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of applying biochar from different animal residues on the agronomic characteristics of cowpea and on soil quality bioindicators. Three types of biochar (bovine, swine and poultry) were applied, combined (BBF: Bovine Biochar + Fertilizer; SBF: Swine Biochar + Fertilizer; and PBF: Poultry Biochar + Fertilizer) or not with fertilizer (BB: Bovine Biochar; SB: Swine Biochar; and PB: Poultry Biochar), and two control treatments with addition of calcium and magnesium oxide (CT) and calcium and magnesium oxide + fertilizer (CTF), totaling eight treatments. There was an increase in stem diameter, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and stem dry mass when biochar was added, regardless of the combination with fertilizer. There was no difference between treatments for soil basal respiration and β-glucosidase enzyme activity, while organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), microbial carbon and soil labile carbon were higher in treatments with the presence of biochar. Among the treatments with only biochar application, the BBF treatment contributed to obtaining a higher TOC content, while BAF increased the NT content in the soil. Additionally, the application of biochar contributed to the reduction of soil metabolic quotient values. Thus, it can be concluded that biochar associated with conventional fertilization can improve soil quality, and consequently the productivity of cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar increased cowpea stem diameter, regardless of combination with fertilizer.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in stem diameter, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and stem dry mass when biochar was added, regardless of the combination with fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar increased the number of pods per cowpea plant, regardless of combination with fertilizer.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in stem diameter, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and stem dry mass when biochar was added, regardless of the combination with fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar increased the number of grains per pod in cowpea, regardless of combination with fertilizer.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
number of grains per pode0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in stem diameter, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and stem dry mass when biochar was added, regardless of the combination with fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar increased cowpea stem dry mass, regardless of combination with fertilizer.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
stem dry masse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was an increase in stem diameter, number of pods per plant, number of grains per pod and stem dry mass when biochar was added, regardless of the combination with fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not differ in soil basal respiration or β-glucosidase enzyme activity.

Treatment
biochart1
Outcome
soil basal respiration and β-glucosidase enzyme activitye0
Direction
no differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference between treatments for soil basal respiration and β-glucosidase enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“application of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil total organic carbon and total nitrogen were higher in treatments with biochar.

Treatment
presence of biochare0
Outcome
organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), microbial carbon and soil labile carbon were higher in treatments with the presence of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial carbon and labile carbon were higher in treatments with biochar.

Treatment
presence of biochare0
Outcome
microbial carbon and soil labile carbone0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), microbial carbon and soil labile carbon were higher in treatments with the presence of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among treatments with only biochar, the bovine biochar plus fertilizer treatment (BBF) gave the highest soil total organic carbon content.

Treatment
BBFe0
Outcome
TOC contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
treatments with only biochar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments with only biochar application, the BBF treatment contributed to obtaining a higher TOC content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The BAF treatment increased soil total nitrogen content.

Treatment
BAFe0
Outcome
NT content in the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BAF increased the NT content in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying biochar reduced soil metabolic quotient values.

Treatment
application of biochare0
Outcome
soil metabolic quotient valuese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of biochar contributed to the reduction of soil metabolic quotient values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1488 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that biochar with conventional fertilization can improve soil quality and thereby cowpea productivity.

Outcome
improve soil quality, and consequently the productivity of cowpeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar associated with conventional fertilization can improve soil quality, and consequently the productivity of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1641 · show in text ↑

biochar · soil: biology · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

biochar · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

biochar · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

biochar · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.