Paper · 2025 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Empty oil palm fruit bunch biochar and compost influence soil properties that drive okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus L.) nutrient use efficiency and yield

Dorcas Blankson; Emmanuel Arthur; Kofi Atiah; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The efficacy of empty oil palm fruit bunch (EFB) on crop productivity was evaluated by examining the effect of a one‐time application of EFB biochar and compost on soil properties, okra ( Abelmoschus esculentus L.) nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency, and yields across two cropping cycles. Treatments involved EFB biochar at 10 and 20 t ha −1 (B10 and B20), EFB compost at 20 t ha −1 (CP20), combinations of biochar and compost (B10CP20 and B20CP20), an unamended control (B0), and an inorganic fertilizer treatment (NPK). Soil chemical properties, okra yield, and microbial biomass were assessed using the whole‐cell fatty acid (WCFA) profiling method. The results showed that both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle. CP20 and B20CP20 treatments increased yield by 58% and 100%, respectively, compared to the mineral fertilizer treatment. These treatments also enhanced phosphorus uptake and recovery efficiency, primarily due to increased soil pH and improved nutrient availability. B20CP20 was especially effective in boosting cation exchange capacity (CEC) and micronutrient content. The presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the CP20 treatment was associated with improved phosphorus uptake and recovery in the second cycle. However, an overall decline in soil CEC and total organic carbon by an average of 16% and 25%, respectively, resulted in a threefold yield reduction in the second cycle. Importantly, only the B20CP20 treatment sustained yield increases into the second cycle. The study demonstrates that a one‐time co‐application of EFB biochar and compost can enhance soil fertility and soil microbial properties and increase nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies, resulting in increased okra yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields by up to 283% in the first cropping cycle.

Treatment
single and combined applications of EFB biochar and composte1
Outcome
okra pod yieldse1
Direction
improvede1
Value
283%e1
Qualifier
in the first cropping cyclee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CP20 increased okra yield by 58% compared with the mineral fertilizer treatment.

Treatment
CP20e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
58%e2
Comparator
mineral fertilizer treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e2

“CP20 and B20CP20 treatments increased yield by 58% and 100%, respectively, compared to the mineral fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B20CP20 increased okra yield by 100% compared with the mineral fertilizer treatment.

Treatment
B20CP20e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
100%e2
Comparator
mineral fertilizer treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e2

“CP20 and B20CP20 treatments increased yield by 58% and 100%, respectively, compared to the mineral fertilizer treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–970 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EFB biochar and compost enhanced okra phosphorus uptake and recovery efficiency, primarily through increased soil pH and improved nutrient availability.

Outcome
phosphorus uptake and recovery efficiencye3
Qualifier
primarily due to increased soil pH and improved nutrient availabilitye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e3

“These treatments also enhanced phosphorus uptake and recovery efficiency, primarily due to increased soil pH and improved nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B20CP20 boosted cation exchange capacity and micronutrient content in okra soil.

Treatment
B20CP20e4
Outcome
cation exchange capacity (CEC) and micronutrient contente4
Direction
boostinge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e4

“B20CP20 was especially effective in boosting cation exchange capacity (CEC) and micronutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1218 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the CP20 treatment were associated with improved okra phosphorus uptake and recovery in the second cycle.

Treatment
CP20e5
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie5symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus uptake and recoverye5
Direction
improvede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e5

“The presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the CP20 treatment was associated with improved phosphorus uptake and recovery in the second cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1366 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil cation exchange capacity declined by 16% over the two cropping cycles.

Outcome
soil CECe6
Direction
declinee6
Value
16%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e6

“an overall decline in soil CEC and total organic carbon by an average of 16% and 25%, respectively, resulted in a threefold yield reduction in the second cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1536 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil total organic carbon declined by 25% over the two cropping cycles.

Outcome
total organic carbone6
Direction
declinee6
Value
25%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e6

“an overall decline in soil CEC and total organic carbon by an average of 16% and 25%, respectively, resulted in a threefold yield reduction in the second cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1536 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okra yield fell threefold in the second cropping cycle.

Outcome
yielde6
Direction
reductione6
Value
threefolde6
Qualifier
in the second cyclee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e6

“an overall decline in soil CEC and total organic carbon by an average of 16% and 25%, respectively, resulted in a threefold yield reduction in the second cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only B20CP20 sustained okra yield increases into the second cropping cycle.

Treatment
B20CP20e7
Outcome
yield increasese7
Direction
sustainede7
Qualifier
into the second cyclee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e7

“only the B20CP20 treatment sustained yield increases into the second cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application of EFB biochar and compost increased nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in okra.

Treatment
EFB biochar and composte1
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus use efficienciese2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“both single and combined applications of EFB biochar and compost significantly improved okra pod yields, with increases up to 283% in the first cropping cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–849 · show in text ↑
e2

“increase nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies, resulting in increased okra yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1854 · show in text ↑

biochar · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.