Paper · 2007 · PubMed

Evaluation of soil biodesinfestation with crop and garden residues in the control of root-knot nematodes populations.

J López-Cepero; A Piedra Buena; M A Díez-Rojo; et al.

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Fresh crop and garden residues were applied both under laboratory conditions and in commercial greenhouse in order to asses their effect on soil nematodes populations and soil fertility. In the laboratory experiments, dosages of 5 to 20 g of cabbage residues, chicken manure, cabbage residues+chicken manure, grass+chicken manure, as well as leaves and stems of orange tree, pine tree, oleander, olive tree, palm tree and boxwood were mixed with 500 g soil having root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) and soil moisture was adjusted at field capacity. A control treatment without residues was also included. The mixtures were kept into plastic bags, with four replications, and the bags were incubated for four weeks at 30 degrees C, when nematological and soil fertility analyses were carried out. In general, all these materials significantly (P < 0.05) reduced M. incognita populations and increased saprophagous nematodes, with slight effects on soil fertility except for the K increase with residues application. Tomato plants susceptible to M. incognita were planted in pots with 300 cm3 of the treated soils and kept for five weeks in a growth chamber (24 +/- 1 degrees C, 14 hours light), when root galling indices were evaluated. Most materials applied reduced root galling indices as regards to the control. In the greenhouse experiment, cabbage residues, cabbage residues+chicken manure, grass+chicken manure and grass+cabbage residues were applied to the soil and covered with a polyethylene sheet for 5 weeks. A cabbage residues:chicken manure treatment and a control (not-amended) treatment, without polyethylene, were also included. At the end of the experiment, the nematological analysis showed that all materials successfully controlled M. incognita populations, reaching 86-100% mortality with organic amendments vs. 6% for the control. After the greenhouse biodesinfestation experiment, a tomato crop was grown for one month, when root galling indices were determined. All materials significantly reduced this value from 4.75 in the control to 1.0-2.25 with the organic amendments, except for the cabbage residues+chicken manure treatment without polyethylene (index = 4.0). Our results show that fresh crop and garden residues successfully reduced M. incognita populations and root galling indices when applied with polyethylene covers, having good potential to be considered in integrated management programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied residues significantly reduced soil M. incognita populations.

Taxon
Tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume2
Treatment
all these materialse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
without residuese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all these materials significantly (P < 0.05) reduced M. incognita populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“A control treatment without residues was also included”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–612 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tomato plants susceptible to M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue applications increased saprophagous nematodes.

Taxon
Tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume2
Treatment
all these materialse0
Interactor
saprophagous nematodese0other
Outcome
saprophagous nematodese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
without residuese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all these materials significantly (P < 0.05) reduced M. incognita populations and increased saprophagous nematodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“A control treatment without residues was also included”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–612 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tomato plants susceptible to M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue application increased soil potassium, while other soil fertility effects were slight.

Taxon
Tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume2
Treatment
residues applicatione0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
slight effects on soil fertilitye0
Comparator
without residuese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with slight effects on soil fertility except for the K increase with residues application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1022 · show in text ↑
e1

“A control treatment without residues was also included”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–612 · show in text ↑
e2

“Tomato plants susceptible to M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested residue materials reduced tomato root galling relative to control.

Taxon
Tomato plantsSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment
Most materials appliede0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
root galling indicese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most materials applied reduced root galling indices as regards to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1322 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato plants susceptible to M. incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse organic amendments yielded 86-100% M. incognita mortality, versus 6% in control.

Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita populationse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
86-100%e0
Qualifier
6%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all materials successfully controlled M. incognita populations, reaching 86-100% mortality with organic amendments vs. 6% for the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1860 · show in text ↑
e1

“a tomato crop was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–1936 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse amendments reduced tomato root galling index from 4.75 to 1.0-2.25.

Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pathogen
Outcome
root galling indicese1
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.0-2.25e0
Qualifier
4.75e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All materials significantly reduced this value from 4.75 in the control to 1.0-2.25 with the organic amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1995–2106 · show in text ↑
e1

“root galling indices were determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–1993 · show in text ↑
e2

“a tomato crop was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–1936 · show in text ↑
e3

“all materials successfully controlled M. incognita populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cabbage residues plus chicken manure without polyethylene produced root galling index 4.0, an exception to the reduction.

Treatment
cabbage residues+chicken manure treatment without polyethylenee0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pathogen
Outcome
root galling indicese2
Value
4.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except for the cabbage residues+chicken manure treatment without polyethylene (index = 4.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2108–2199 · show in text ↑
e1

“a tomato crop was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–1936 · show in text ↑
e2

“root galling indices were determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–1993 · show in text ↑
e3

“all materials successfully controlled M. incognita populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1785 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend fresh residues with polyethylene covers for integrated nematode management.

Treatment
fresh crop and garden residuese0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
good potential to be considered in integrated management programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh crop and garden residues successfully reduced M. incognita populations and root galling indices when applied with polyethylene covers, having good potential to be considered in integrated management programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2223–2436 · show in text ↑
e1

“a tomato crop was grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1913–1936 · show in text ↑

organic · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.