Abstract
Growing field pea for grain and forage is an integral part of the livestock development strategy, due to its importance as a good source of protein in improving milk and meat production. This is of particular relevance to livestock producers in Central Serbia who experience problems in alfalfa production on acidic soils. As a legume, field pea also plays a valuable role in crop rotations. More recently, field pea has been used as an important crop in organic and sustainable farming systems. Under non-irrigated conditions, grain yield of spring pea cvs. ‘NS-Junior’ and ‘Javor’ was evaluated in 2011 and 2012 on an acidic soil receiving amendment applications. A field trial was established in Čačak (43°54'39.06" N, 20°19'10.21" E, 246 m a.s.l.) on an alluvial soil acid in reaction (pHH2O 4.8). The experimental field was fertilized with 300 kg ha-1 N15P15K15. The treatments used included an unfertilized control and liming at 3t ha-1 and 6t ha-1. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized block design with four replications. Plot size was 5m2 (1x5m). In both years, the average grain yield of cv. ‘NS-Javor’ was significantly higher than in cv. ‘Junior’. No significant differences were observed between the control and the lime treatments. Grain yield in both years was significantly below the genetic potential of the cultivars tested, mostly due to deficient rainfall and severe soil and air drought conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar NS-Javor had significantly higher average grain yield than cultivar Junior.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Liming on Grain Yield of Field Peas”
e0“Growing field pea for grain and forage”
e1“In both years, the average grain yield of cv. ‘NS-Javor’ was significantly higher than in cv. ‘Junior’”
e5“A field trial was established in Čačak”
Claim · model-written summary
Liming at 3 or 6 t/ha did not change grain yield of field pea compared with the unfertilized control.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Liming on Grain Yield of Field Peas”
e0“Growing field pea for grain and forage”
e2“No significant differences were observed between the control and the lime treatments”
e4“The treatments used included an unfertilized control and liming at 3t ha-1 and 6t ha-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield of field pea was significantly below the genetic potential of the cultivars, due to deficient rainfall and drought.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of Liming on Grain Yield of Field Peas”
e0“Growing field pea for grain and forage”
e3“Grain yield in both years was significantly below the genetic potential of the cultivars tested, mostly due to deficient rainfall and severe soil and air drought conditions”
The same questions in other papers
lime · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.