Paper · 1994 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Vegetative, reproductive and yield responses of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seedlings to low temperature and exogenous sucrose treatments

Abdelaziz Ali Mohamed Ibrahim

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of subjection of 15-day-old plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights and pre-chilling application of 10% sucrose solution on vegetative, reproductive and yield responses were examined under greenhouse conditions. Chilled seedlings exhibited severe inhibition of growth, with the degree of inhibition increasing with length of chilling. While sucrose treatment (ST) reduced such inhibition and promoted subsequent recovery, it transiently inhibited growth of the unchilled controls. In the long-term, inhibition of growth was observed only for the 0%-sucrose-treated plants cooled for 21 nights. Although LNT lowered the position of the first inflorescence in a direct relation to duration of exposure, this effect was reduced by ST. LNT had no lasting effects on the reproductive and productivity responses of the first two inflorescence (FTI), earliness of flowering, or potential yield and quality. ST promoted flowering of only the 21-day-cooled plants as well as numbers of flowers, fruit set and large fruit responses of FTI. The results indicate that, although early chilling stunts seedling growth, plants may recover at a later favorable temperature without loss to their reproductive capacity or yielding potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low night temperature of 4°C for up to 21 nights caused severe inhibition of tomato seedling growth, increasing with chilling length.

Organ / stage
seedlingse1
Treatment
low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nightse0
Outcome
inhibition of growthe1
Direction
inhibitione1
Qualifier
with the degree of inhibition increasing with length of chillinge1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chilled seedlings exhibited severe inhibition of growth, with the degree of inhibition increasing with length of chilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–420 · show in text ↑
e2

“were examined under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose treatment reduced the chilling-induced inhibition of tomato seedling growth.

Treatment
sucrose treatment (ST)e3
Outcome
such inhibitione3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e3

“sucrose treatment (ST) reduced such inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose treatment promoted subsequent recovery of tomato seedlings after chilling.

Treatment
sucrose treatment (ST)e4
Outcome
subsequent recoverye4
Direction
promotede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e4

“sucrose treatment (ST) reduced such inhibition and promoted subsequent recovery”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose treatment transiently inhibited growth of unchilled control tomato plants.

Treatment
sucrose treatment (ST)e5
Outcome
growthe5
Direction
inhibitede5
Qualifier
transientlye5
Comparator
unchilled controlse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e5

“While sucrose treatment (ST) reduced such inhibition and promoted subsequent recovery, it transiently inhibited growth of the unchilled controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term growth inhibition was observed only for tomato plants pre-treated with 0% sucrose and cooled for 21 nights.

Treatment
cooled for 21 nightse6
Outcome
inhibition of growthe6
Direction
inhibitione6
Qualifier
In the long-terme6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e6

“In the long-term, inhibition of growth was observed only for the 0%-sucrose-treated plants cooled for 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low night temperature lowered the position of the first inflorescence of tomato in direct relation to duration of exposure.

Treatment
LNTe7
Outcome
position of the first inflorescencee7
Direction
lowerede7
Qualifier
in a direct relation to duration of exposuree7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e7

“Although LNT lowered the position of the first inflorescence in a direct relation to duration of exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose treatment reduced the effect of low night temperature on the position of the first tomato inflorescence.

Treatment
STe1
Outcome
effecte1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“this effect was reduced by ST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low night temperature had no lasting effect on the reproductive and productivity responses of the first two tomato inflorescences.

Treatment
LNTe1
Outcome
reproductive and productivity responses of the first two inflorescence (FTI)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“LNT had no lasting effects on the reproductive and productivity responses of the first two inflorescence (FTI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low night temperature had no lasting effect on earliness of flowering, potential yield or quality of tomato.

Treatment
LNTe1
Outcome
earliness of flowering, or potential yield and qualitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“LNT had no lasting effects on the reproductive and productivity responses of the first two inflorescence (FTI), earliness of flowering, or potential yield and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose treatment promoted flowering only in the tomato plants cooled for 21 days.

Treatment
STe1
Outcome
floweringe1
Direction
promotede1
Qualifier
of only the 21-day-cooled plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“ST promoted flowering of only the 21-day-cooled plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose treatment promoted the number of flowers, fruit set and large fruit responses of the first two tomato inflorescences.

Treatment
STe1
Outcome
numbers of flowers, fruit set and large fruit responses of FTIe1
Direction
promotede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. 'Contessa') to low night temperature (LNT) of 4°C for up to 21 nights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 40–154 · show in text ↑
e1

“ST promoted flowering of only the 21-day-cooled plants as well as numbers of flowers, fruit set and large fruit responses of FTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1115 · show in text ↑

sucrose · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sucrose · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sucrose · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.