Abstract
Field studies conducted at six locations in Georgia and one location in Virginia evaluated imazethapyr and imazethapyr mixtures for weed control, crop tolerance, and peanut yield. Imazethapyr applied early postemergence controlled bristly starbur, coffee senna, common cocklebur, Ipomoea species, jimsonweed, prickly sida, and smallflower morningglory at least 91% and controlled yellow and purple nutsedge 88 and 98%, respectively. Paraquat plus bentazon applied early postemergence did not control the aforementioned weeds as well as imazethapyr or imazethapyr mixtures. Paraquat applied with imazethapyr reduced bristly starbur control 15% compared to imazethapyr alone but did not influence control of the other species. Imazethapyr control of bristly starbur was not improved by the addition of bentazon. Sicklepod control was less than 24% with imazethapyr and was at least 58% with imazethapyr plus paraquat Imazethapyr plus paraquat controlled sicklepod better than paraquat plus bentazon at three of the four locations evaluated. Imazethapyr did not control Florida beggarweed, while imazethapyr plus paraquat controlled at least 53%. Peanut injury was minimal 30 d after application for all treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Early imazethapyr controlled seven named broadleaf weeds at least 91%.
- Taxon
- Peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Imazethapyr applied early postemergencee0
- Interactor
- bristly starbure0weed
- Outcome
- controlled bristly starbur, coffee senna, common cocklebur, Ipomoea species, jimsonweed, prickly sida, and smallflower morningglorye0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 91%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e0“Imazethapyr applied early postemergence controlled bristly starbur, coffee senna, common cocklebur, Ipomoea species, jimsonweed, prickly sida, and smallflower morningglory at least 91%”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr controlled yellow nutsedge by 88%.
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“controlled yellow and purple nutsedge 88 and 98%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr controlled purple nutsedge by 98%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Interactor
- purple nutsedgee0weed
- Outcome
- purple nutsedgee0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- 98%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“controlled yellow and purple nutsedge 88 and 98%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Paraquat plus bentazon controlled the named weeds less well than imazethapyr mixtures.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Paraquat plus bentazon applied early postemergencee0
- Outcome
- control the aforementioned weedse0
- Direction
- did not controle0
- Comparator
- imazethapyr or imazethapyr mixturese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Paraquat plus bentazon applied early postemergence did not control the aforementioned weeds as well as imazethapyr or imazethapyr mixtures.”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding paraquat to imazethapyr reduced bristly starbur control by 15%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Paraquat applied with imazethapyre0
- Interactor
- bristly starbure0weed
- Outcome
- bristly starbur controle0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 15%e0
- Comparator
- imazethapyr alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Paraquat applied with imazethapyr reduced bristly starbur control 15% compared to imazethapyr alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding paraquat did not change control of the other weed species.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- control of the other speciese0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“but did not influence control of the other species.”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding bentazon did not improve imazethapyr control of bristly starbur.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- addition of bentazone0
- Interactor
- bristly starbure0weed
- Outcome
- control of bristly starbure0
- Direction
- not improvede0
- Comparator
- Imazethapyre0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Imazethapyr control of bristly starbur was not improved by the addition of bentazon.”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr controlled sicklepod by less than 24%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imazethapyre0
- Interactor
- Sicklepode0weed
- Outcome
- Sicklepod controle0
- Direction
- less thane0
- Value
- 24%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Sicklepod control was less than 24% with imazethapyr”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr plus paraquat controlled sicklepod by at least 58%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imazethapyr plus paraquate0
- Interactor
- Sicklepode1weed
- Outcome
- Sicklepod controle1
- Direction
- at leaste0
- Value
- 58%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“was at least 58% with imazethapyr plus paraquat”
e1“Sicklepod control”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr plus paraquat outperformed paraquat plus bentazon against sicklepod at three of four locations.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Imazethapyr plus paraquate0
- Interactor
- sicklepode0weed
- Outcome
- sicklepode0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- three of the four locationse0
- Comparator
- paraquat plus bentazone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Imazethapyr plus paraquat controlled sicklepod better than paraquat plus bentazon at three of the four locations evaluated.”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr did not control Florida beggarweed.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Imazethapyre0
- Interactor
- Florida beggarweed
Desmodium tortuosume0weed - Outcome
- Florida beggarweede0
- Direction
- did not controle0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Imazethapyr did not control Florida beggarweed”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazethapyr plus paraquat controlled Florida beggarweed by at least 53%.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imazethapyr plus paraquate0
- Interactor
- Florida beggarweedDesmodium tortuosume1weed
- Outcome
- Florida beggarweede1
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- at least 53%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“imazethapyr plus paraquat controlled at least 53%”
e1“Florida beggarweed”
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments caused minimal peanut injury after 30 days.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- all treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Peanut injurye0
- Direction
- minimale0
- Qualifier
- 30 d after applicatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Peanut”
e0“Peanut injury was minimal 30 d after application for all treatments.”
The same questions in other papers
paraquat · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
Imazethapyr · Desmodium tortuosum · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
bentazone · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →paraquat · Desmodium tortuosum · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Imazethapyr · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →paraquat · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →bentazone · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →herbicide · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.