Paper · 1992 · Journal of Entomological Science

Control of Edaphic Populations of Woolly Apple Aphid using Entomopathogenic Nematodes and a Systemic Aphicide

M. W. Brown; J. J. Jaegers; A. E. Pye; et al.

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of an entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema carpocapsae (Weiser), and an experimental systemic aphicide, RH-7988, on edaphic populations of the woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann), were investigated. Laboratory experiments showed that presence of the nematode in a culture of woolly apple aphids increased the mortality rate. Nematodes were found inside the body cavity of several aphids with entry possibly being through the anus via a droplet of honeydew. Field trials in an unsprayed six-year-old and four-year-old apple orchard tested the efficacy of broadcast spray and topdressing applications, respectively, of nematodes at a rate of 376,600 nematodes/m2. The broadcast spray trees had fewer aphid colonies on roots than the untreated controls (P = 0.10), but the topdressing treatment had no effect. The systemic aphicide, RH-7988, was tested in a two-year-old apple orchard. Two rates of foliar and soil application were tested, with all treatments significantly reducing arboreal woolly apple aphid populations. Edaphic populations were also significantly reduced one month after treatment, but no difference was found four months after treatment. Both control methods show promise as potential management options for edaphic woolly apple aphid populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes increased woolly apple aphid mortality in laboratory culture.

Treatment
presence of the nematodee0
Interactor
woolly apple aphidsEriosoma lanigerume0pest
Second interactor
Steinernema carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaet1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
woolly apple aphids increased the mortality ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eriosoma lanigerum
Eriosoma lanigerum · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema carpocapsae
Steinernema carpocapsae · Second interactorMirayana M. Barros, Dennis Chang, Dihong Lu, and Adler R. Dillman · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presence of the nematode in a culture of woolly apple aphids increased the mortality rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“Steinernema carpocapsae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes were found within aphid body cavities.

Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Second interactor
Steinernema carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaet1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Nematodes were found inside the body cavity of several aphidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema carpocapsae
Steinernema carpocapsae · Second interactorMirayana M. Barros, Dennis Chang, Dihong Lu, and Adler R. Dillman · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematodes were found inside the body cavity of several aphids with entry possibly being through the anus via a droplet of honeydew.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“Steinernema carpocapsae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode broadcast spray reduced root aphid colonies versus untreated controls.

Treatment
broadcast spraye0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Second interactor
Steinernema carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaet1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
aphid colonies on rootse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema carpocapsae
Steinernema carpocapsae · Second interactorMirayana M. Barros, Dennis Chang, Dihong Lu, and Adler R. Dillman · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The broadcast spray trees had fewer aphid colonies on roots than the untreated controls (P = 0.10), but the topdressing treatment had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“Steinernema carpocapsae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode topdressing had no effect.

Treatment
topdressing treatmente0
Interactor
woolly apple aphidEriosoma lanigerume1pest
Outcome
no effecte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eriosoma lanigerum
Eriosoma lanigerum · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the topdressing treatment had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All RH-7988 treatments significantly reduced arboreal woolly apple aphids.

Treatment
foliar and soil applicatione0
Interactor
woolly apple aphidEriosoma lanigerume0pest
Outcome
arboreal woolly apple aphid populationse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eriosoma lanigerum
Eriosoma lanigerum · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two rates of foliar and soil application were tested, with all treatments significantly reducing arboreal woolly apple aphid populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RH-7988 significantly reduced edaphic aphids at one month.

Treatment
RH-7988e2
Interactor
woolly apple aphidEriosoma lanigerume1pest
Outcome
Edaphic populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
one month after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eriosoma lanigerum
Eriosoma lanigerum · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Edaphic populations were also significantly reduced one month after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–206 · show in text ↑
e2

“The systemic aphicide, RH-7988, was tested in a two-year-old apple orchard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RH-7988 showed no difference in edaphic aphids after four months.

Treatment
RH-7988e2
Interactor
woolly apple aphidEriosoma lanigerume1pest
Outcome
no differencee0
Direction
no differencee0
Qualifier
four months after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eriosoma lanigerum
Eriosoma lanigerum · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no difference was found four months after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“woolly apple aphid, Eriosoma lanigerum (Hausmann)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–206 · show in text ↑
e2

“The systemic aphicide, RH-7988, was tested in a two-year-old apple orchard.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–910 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors regard both control methods as promising for edaphic aphids.

Interactor
woolly apple aphidEriosoma lanigerume0pest
Outcome
potential management options for edaphic woolly apple aphid populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Eriosoma lanigerum
Eriosoma lanigerum · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both control methods show promise as potential management options for edaphic woolly apple aphid populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑

application · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 30 positive, 11 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

application · Eriosoma lanigerum · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.