Paper · 2004 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

A simulation program for the timing of fungicides to control Sooty Blotch in organic apple growing. First results in 2003

M. Trapman

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A simulation program for infections by Sooty Blotch was developed based on literature data and expert judgements. The value of the model as tool for timing fungicide sprays to control Sooty Blotch was tested in 2003 in two randomized plot trials, and four “on farm” trials where the treatments where made by the growers. Disease pressure was relative low due to the warm and dry summer of 2003. Two to five post infection treatments with lime sulfur or coconut soap aimed at severe infection periods as indicated by the model provides 72 to 100 % control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two to five model-timed postinfection lime sulfur treatments provided 72 to 100% sooty blotch control.

Treatment
Two to five post infection treatments with lime sulfure0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
72 to 100 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: The disease is named, but its causal organism is not.

Verbatim

e0

“Two to five post infection treatments with lime sulfur or coconut soap aimed at severe infection periods as indicated by the model provides 72 to 100 % control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“organic apple growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two to five model-timed postinfection coconut soap treatments provided 72 to 100% sooty blotch control.

Treatment
coconut soape0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
72 to 100 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: The disease is named, but its causal organism is not.

Verbatim

e0

“Two to five post infection treatments with lime sulfur or coconut soap aimed at severe infection periods as indicated by the model provides 72 to 100 % control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“organic apple growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–98 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

infection · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.