Paper · 2002 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

The post-infection use of lime sulphur to control apple scab. Experiences in the Netherlands 1999-2002.

M. Trapman

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Until yet the fongicides in organic fruit growing (sulphur, lime sulphur, copper, claypowders) are used as protectants applied before the rain, or as stop-spray or during infection development. Post infection use of lime sulphur could reduce the number of spray rounds, allowing for the use of less pesticides, and reducing the adverse effect on beneficial insects and mites. In the 30's of the last century, post-infection effects of lime sulphur were found in lab and field trials. Effective control was achieved by applications 30 to even 72 hours after the start of rain. Field trials in the Netherlands in 1999, 2000 and 2001 confirmed that post-infection applications of lime sulphur are effective under field conditions till at least 20 hours after the start of the infection. Evaluation of the practical experiences with the use of lime sulphur as post-infection spray in 2000 and 2001 however showed that a dose of at least 0,15 % should be used, and the product should be applied with a high water volume, or on wet leaves to allow for an effective contact between the pentasulphides and the fungus. In 2000 one application of lime sulphur two weeks after blossom lead to severe russeting of the fruit skin on the variety Jonagold.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier trials achieved apple-scab control with lime sulphur applied 30 to 72 hours after rain began.

Treatment
lime sulphure1
Outcome
Effective controle0
Value
30 to even 72 hourse0
Qualifier
after the start of raine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective control was achieved by applications 30 to even 72 hours after the start of rain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-infection effects of lime sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Netherlands field trials confirmed effective post-infection lime sulphur through at least 20 hours after infection began.

Treatment
post-infection applications of lime sulphure0
Outcome
effectivee0
Value
at least 20 hourse0
Setting
Netherlandse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials in the Netherlands in 1999, 2000 and 2001 confirmed that post-infection applications of lime sulphur are effective under field conditions till at least 20 hours after the start of the infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Practical experience indicated that effective lime sulphur contact requires at least 0,15 % in high water volume or on wet leaves.

Treatment
lime sulphure1
Outcome
a dose of at least 0,15 % should be usede0
Value
at least 0,15 %e0
Qualifier
high water volume, or on wet leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a dose of at least 0,15 % should be used, and the product should be applied with a high water volume, or on wet leaves to allow for an effective contact between the pentasulphides and the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1108 · show in text ↑
e1

“use of lime sulphur as post-infection spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One lime sulphur application two weeks after blossom severely russeted Jonagold fruit skin.

Material
Jonagolde0
Organ / stage
fruit skine0
Treatment
one application of lime sulphur two weeks after blossome0
Outcome
severe russeting of the fruit skine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2000 one application of lime sulphur two weeks after blossom lead to severe russeting of the fruit skin on the variety Jonagold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–60 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

lime · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.