Paper · 1998 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Seasonal Distribution of Bemesia Honeydew Sugars on Pima and Upland Cotton Lint

T. J. Henneberry; L. Forlow Jech; Donald L. Hendrix

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring populations were higher on Pima S-7 cotton compared with DPL 50 cotton. Higher numbers of mature open cotton bolls occurred earlier for DPL 50 compared with Pima S-7. Also, numbers of open bolls for DPL 50 peaked 8 to 14 days before Pima S-7 and decreased dramatically by 15 September reflecting termination of the first fruiting cycle in August In contrast the indeterminate fruiting pattern of Pima S-7 showed that numbers of open bolls per week declined gradually after the peak without a clear cut termination occurrence. About 95 and 80% of the open cotton bolls, of the Deltapine and Pima S-7 cottons, respectively, occurred by mid- September. This suggests that defoliation timing and early harvest can be important management tools to avoid sticky cotton. For upland cotton, extending the cotton season after 95% of the crop matured (≅ 15 September) resulted in development from non - sticky cotton to lightly- sticky cotton within 21 days following the occurrence of increasing whitefly populations after 15 September. Later fruiting and lack of a distinct end of the first cotton fruiting cycle probably precludes using early defoliation for long -staple Pima cotton. At harvest, thermodetector counts for all weekly harvests were greater than amounts found in lint for randomly selected 20 boll samples; and samples from all cotton picked from 4 m of row. This probably occurred because weekly picked cotton escaped rainfall and exposure and other weathering, in 1995 but not 1996, and machine - picked cotton contains more honeydew- contaminated leaf trash. Except in one instance, thermodetector counts and trehalulose and melezitose content in lint for all sampling methods were significantly correlated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly populations were higher on Pima S-7 than DPL 50 cotton.

Material
Pima S-7e0
Interactor
Bemisia argentifoliiBemisia argentifoliie0pest
Outcome
Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring populationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
DPL 50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia argentifolii
Bemisia argentifolii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryScott Bauer, USDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring populations were higher on Pima S-7 cotton compared with DPL 50 cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature open bolls appeared earlier on DPL 50 than Pima S-7.

Material
DPL 50e0
Outcome
mature open cotton bollse0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
Pima S-7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher numbers of mature open cotton bolls occurred earlier for DPL 50 compared with Pima S-7.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPL 50 open boll counts peaked 8 to 14 days before Pima S-7.

Material
DPL 50e0
Outcome
numbers of open bollse0
Direction
beforee0
Value
8 to 14 dayse0
Comparator
Pima S-7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“numbers of open bolls for DPL 50 peaked 8 to 14 days before Pima S-7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Lint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPL 50 open boll counts decreased sharply by 15 September.

Outcome
first fruiting cyclee0
Direction
decreased dramaticallye0
Qualifier
15 Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased dramatically by 15 September reflecting termination of the first fruiting cycle in August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Lint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pima S-7 open boll counts declined gradually after their peak.

Material
Pima S-7e1
Outcome
numbers of open bolls per weeke0
Direction
declined graduallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“numbers of open bolls per week declined gradually after the peak without a clear cut termination occurrence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“the indeterminate fruiting pattern of Pima S-7 showed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Lint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 95% of Deltapine bolls were open by mid-September.

Material
Deltapinee0
Outcome
open cotton bollse0
Value
95e0
Qualifier
mid- Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 95 and 80% of the open cotton bolls, of the Deltapine and Pima S-7 cottons, respectively, occurred by mid- September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–690 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 80% of Pima S-7 bolls were open by mid-September.

Material
Pima S-7e0
Outcome
open cotton bollse0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
mid- Septembere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 95 and 80% of the open cotton bolls, of the Deltapine and Pima S-7 cottons, respectively, occurred by mid- September.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extending the upland cotton season after crop maturity produced lightly sticky cotton within 21 days.

Treatment
extending the cotton seasone0
Outcome
lightly- sticky cottone0
Value
21 dayse0
Comparator
non - sticky cottone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“extending the cotton season after 95% of the crop matured (≅ 15 September) resulted in development from non - sticky cotton to lightly- sticky cotton within 21 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–988 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thermodetector counts at harvest exceeded counts in the other cotton sampling methods.

Outcome
thermodetector countse0
Direction
greater thane0
Comparator
randomly selected 20 boll samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, thermodetector counts for all weekly harvests were greater than amounts found in lint for randomly selected 20 boll samples; and samples from all cotton picked from 4 m of row.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thermodetector counts correlated significantly with trehalulose and melezitose content.

Outcome
thermodetector countse0
Comparator
trehalulose and melezitose contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except in one instance, thermodetector counts and trehalulose and melezitose content in lint for all sampling methods were significantly correlated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Lint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑

climate site · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.