Paper · 2012 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of organic manures and biofertilizers on yield, dry matter partitioning and quality traits of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)

A K UPADHYAY; ANANT BAHADUR; JAGDISH SINGH

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of three different biofertilizers in combination with four different organic manures or with inorganic fertilizers on dry matter partitioning, yield and quality traits in cabbage. Results indicated that treatments comprising recommended fertilizers package coupled with seedling inoculation in any biofertilizer had relatively higher dry matter in leaves (head), higher number of non-wrapper leaves and head yield (40.81– 41.88±1.07 tonnes/ha). Application of pressmud or vermicompost plus seedling inoculation in Azospirillum or PSM noticed head yield at par with conventional fertilization. The total carbohydrate content in head was significantly higher with use of organic manures and VAM or PSM. The maximum protein content was noticed with sole application of vermicompost (17.4%) or digested sludge (17.3%). Fibre content in head was improved remarkably with the use of organic manures and biofertilizers. The highest total carotenoid content in head was recorded with the use of FYM + PSM (0.445 mg/100 g). Significantly higher ascorbic acid content (vitamin C) in head was registered with the use of either FYM or pressmud along with PSM or VAM (14.25–15.48±0.33 mg/100 g).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended fertilizer plus biofertilizer inoculation increased cabbage head dry matter, non-wrapper leaves, and head yield.

Treatment
recommended fertilizers package coupled with seedling inoculation in any biofertilizere0
Outcome
dry matter in leaves (head), higher number of non-wrapper leaves and head yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
40.81– 41.88±1.07 tonnes/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments comprising recommended fertilizers package coupled with seedling inoculation in any biofertilizer had relatively higher dry matter in leaves (head), higher number of non-wrapper leaves and head yield (40.81– 41.88±1.07 tonnes/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressmud with Azospirillum inoculation gave cabbage head yield comparable to conventional fertilization.

Treatment
pressmude0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
head yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of pressmud or vermicompost plus seedling inoculation in Azospirillum or PSM noticed head yield at par with conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures with VAM or PSM raised cabbage head carbohydrate content.

Treatment
organic manures and VAM or PSMe0
Outcome
total carbohydrate content in heade0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total carbohydrate content in head was significantly higher with use of organic manures and VAM or PSM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost alone produced maximum cabbage protein content of 17.4%.

Treatment
sole application of vermicomposte0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
17.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum protein content was noticed with sole application of vermicompost (17.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digested sludge alone produced maximum cabbage protein content of 17.3%.

Treatment
digested sludgee0
Outcome
protein contente0
Value
17.3%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum protein content was noticed with sole application of vermicompost (17.4%) or digested sludge (17.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manures and biofertilizers improved cabbage head fibre content.

Treatment
organic manures and biofertilizerse0
Outcome
Fibre content in heade0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fibre content in head was improved remarkably with the use of organic manures and biofertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus PSM gave the highest cabbage head carotenoid content, 0.445 mg/100 g.

Treatment
FYM + PSMe0
Outcome
total carotenoid content in heade0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.445 mg/100 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total carotenoid content in head was recorded with the use of FYM + PSM (0.445 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM or pressmud with PSM or VAM increased cabbage head ascorbic acid content.

Treatment
either FYM or pressmud along with PSM or VAMe0
Outcome
ascorbic acid content (vitamin C) in heade0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.25–15.48±0.33 mg/100 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher ascorbic acid content (vitamin C) in head was registered with the use of either FYM or pressmud along with PSM or VAM (14.25–15.48±0.33 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–142 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

storage · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

inoculation · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 62 positive, 4 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

496 papers: 445 positive, 51 negative or no effect

444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

492 papers more in this group

See all 496 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.