Paper · 2003 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Total and individual glucosinolate contents in inflorescences of eight broccoli cultivars grown under various climatic and fertilisation conditions

F Vallejo; F A Tomás‐Barberán; A Gonzalez Benavente‐García; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
122
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Total aliphatic, indolic and aromatic glucosinolates were evaluated in the edible portions of fresh harvested inflorescences of five commercial and three experimental broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L var italica ) cultivars grown under various climatic and agronomic conditions, ie early (winter) or late (spring) season with poor (15 kg ha −1 ) or rich (150 kg ha −1 ) sulphur fertilisation, in an attempt to identify differences due to genetic and agronomic factors. The predominant glucosinolates in all broccoli cultivars were 4‐methylsulphinylbutyl‐glucosinolate (glucoraphanin), 3‐indolylmethyl‐glucosinolate (glucobrassicin) and 1‐methoxy‐3‐indolylmethyl‐glucosinolate (neoglucobrassicin). The results showed no significance differences in total glucosinolates between rich and poor fertilisation, whereas total glucosinolates were detected more significantly in the late than in the early season. All broccoli cultivars showed a higher content of indolic glucosinolates than aliphatic glucosinolates. Clear advantages were detected in the analysed commercial cultivars, as the experimental cultivars yielded lower concentrations of these compounds. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total glucosinolate content did not differ significantly between rich and poor sulphur fertilisation.

Treatment
sulphur fertilisatione2
Outcome
total glucosinolatese3
Direction
no significance differencese3
Comparator
poore3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Total aliphatic, indolic and aromatic glucosinolates were evaluated in the edible portions of fresh harvested inflorescences of five commercial and three experimental broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L var italica ) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–230 · show in text ↑
e2

“ie early (winter) or late (spring) season with poor (15 kg ha −1 ) or rich (150 kg ha −1 ) sulphur fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–398 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results showed no significance differences in total glucosinolates between rich and poor fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total glucosinolates were detected more significantly in the late (spring) season than in the early (winter) season.

Treatment
late (spring) seasone2
Outcome
total glucosinolatese4
Direction
more significantlye4
Comparator
early (winter)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Total aliphatic, indolic and aromatic glucosinolates were evaluated in the edible portions of fresh harvested inflorescences of five commercial and three experimental broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L var italica ) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–230 · show in text ↑
e2

“ie early (winter) or late (spring) season with poor (15 kg ha −1 ) or rich (150 kg ha −1 ) sulphur fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–398 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas total glucosinolates were detected more significantly in the late than in the early season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–910 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All broccoli cultivars had a higher content of indolic glucosinolates than of aliphatic glucosinolates.

Outcome
content of indolic glucosinolatese5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
aliphatic glucosinolatese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Total aliphatic, indolic and aromatic glucosinolates were evaluated in the edible portions of fresh harvested inflorescences of five commercial and three experimental broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L var italica ) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–230 · show in text ↑
e5

“All broccoli cultivars showed a higher content of indolic glucosinolates than aliphatic glucosinolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1014 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial broccoli cultivars had clear advantages, with experimental cultivars yielding lower glucosinolate concentrations.

Material
commercial cultivarse6
Outcome
concentrations of these compoundse6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
experimental cultivarse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Total aliphatic, indolic and aromatic glucosinolates were evaluated in the edible portions of fresh harvested inflorescences of five commercial and three experimental broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L var italica ) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–230 · show in text ↑
e6

“Clear advantages were detected in the analysed commercial cultivars, as the experimental cultivars yielded lower concentrations of these compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The predominant glucosinolates in broccoli inflorescences include glucoraphanin.

Outcome
predominant glucosinolatese7
Qualifier
glucoraphanine7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Total aliphatic, indolic and aromatic glucosinolates were evaluated in the edible portions of fresh harvested inflorescences of five commercial and three experimental broccoli ( Brassica oleracea L var italica ) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–230 · show in text ↑
e7

“The predominant glucosinolates in all broccoli cultivars were 4‐methylsulphinylbutyl‐glucosinolate (glucoraphanin), 3‐indolylmethyl‐glucosinolate (glucobrassicin) and 1‐methoxy‐3‐indolylmethyl‐glucosinolate (neoglucobrassicin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–702 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.