Paper · 1977 · Journal of Range Management

Growth of Selected Plants on Wyoming Surface-Mined Soils and Flyash

Gene S. Howard; Gerald E. Schuman; Frank Rauzi

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This greenhouse study was initiated to determine potential plant growth on three surface-mined soils and their overburden, and on coal flyash mixtures from sites in Wyoming prior to field studies and plant establishment trials. There was no indication that either topsoil or overburden from the active mine sites in Gillette, Hanna, or Shirley Basin, was detrimental to plant growth when water and temperature were not limiting. Forage plants and range shrubs on each soil benefited from the addition of N and/or P fertilizer. The addition of sewage sludge or manure also greatly increased growth. The study indicated that certain mixtures of flyash in soil and sludge can be successfully revegetated. The application of this data may be extensive in the reclamation and revegetation of surface-mined soils in those areas tested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mine topsoil and overburden were not detrimental to plant growth when water and temperature were adequate.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaet0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Qualifier
when water and temperature were not limitinge0
Setting
Gillette, Hanna, or Shirley Basine0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no indication that either topsoil or overburden from the active mine sites in Gillette, Hanna, or Shirley Basin, was detrimental to plant growth when water and temperature were not limiting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Selected Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N and/or P fertilizer benefited forage plants and range shrubs on each soil.

Taxon
Forage plants and range shrubse0
Treatment
addition of N and/or P fertilizere0
Outcome
benefitede0
Direction
benefitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Forage plants and range shrubs on each soil benefited from the addition of N and/or P fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge greatly increased plant growth.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
sewage sludgee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of sewage sludge or manure also greatly increased growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Selected Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure greatly increased plant growth.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaet0
Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of sewage sludge or manure also greatly increased growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Selected Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Certain flyash mixtures with soil and sludge could be successfully revegetated.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaet0
Outcome
successfully revegetatede0
Qualifier
certain mixtures of flyash in soil and sludgee0

Verbatim

e0

“certain mixtures of flyash in soil and sludge can be successfully revegetated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Selected Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–25 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.