Abstract
A study was conducted on Anthurium andraeanum Andre cv. Kozohara Red testing wood bark, wood chips, redwood bark, and bagasse media with fertilizer levels of 100, 200, and 400lb N-P205 -K20/A/year. Media ranking from best to poorest for flower production, flower stem length, and flower size were wood bark > wood chips > bagasse = redwood bark. Flower production and flower size increased linearly with increase in fertilizer rate. Flower stem length was not affected by fertilizer rate. Fertilizer response was similar on all media.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Wood bark ranked best, then wood chips, then bagasse and redwood bark for flower production.
- Treatment
- wood barke0
- Outcome
- flower productione0
- Direction
- beste0
- Comparator
- wood chips > bagasse = redwood barke0
AnthuriumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Media ranking from best to poorest for flower production, flower stem length, and flower size were wood bark > wood chips > bagasse = redwood bark.”
t0“Performance of Wood Products as Media for Culture of Anthuriums”
Claim · model-written summary
Wood bark ranked best, then wood chips, then bagasse and redwood bark for flower stem length.
- Treatment
- wood barke0
- Outcome
- flower stem lengthe0
- Direction
- beste0
- Comparator
- wood chips > bagasse = redwood barke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Media ranking from best to poorest for flower production, flower stem length, and flower size were wood bark > wood chips > bagasse = redwood bark.”
t0“Performance of Wood Products as Media for Culture of Anthuriums”
Claim · model-written summary
Wood bark ranked best, then wood chips, then bagasse and redwood bark for flower size.
- Treatment
- wood barke0
- Outcome
- flower sizee0
- Direction
- beste0
- Comparator
- wood chips > bagasse = redwood barke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Media ranking from best to poorest for flower production, flower stem length, and flower size were wood bark > wood chips > bagasse = redwood bark.”
t0“Performance of Wood Products as Media for Culture of Anthuriums”
Claim · model-written summary
Flower production increased linearly with fertilizer rate.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flower production and flower size increased linearly with increase in fertilizer rate.”
t0“Performance of Wood Products as Media for Culture of Anthuriums”
Claim · model-written summary
Flower size increased linearly with fertilizer rate.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flower production and flower size increased linearly with increase in fertilizer rate.”
t0“Performance of Wood Products as Media for Culture of Anthuriums”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer rate did not affect flower stem length.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flower stem length was not affected by fertilizer rate.”
t0“Performance of Wood Products as Media for Culture of Anthuriums”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer response was similar across all media.
- Outcome
- Fertilizer response was similar on all mediae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fertilizer response was similar on all media.”
t0“Performance of Wood Products as Media for Culture of Anthuriums”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · AnthuriumPositive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.