Paper · 2025 · Discover Plants.

Novel cyanobacteria-based seed coatings for enhancing germination, seedling vigour and iron nutrition in direct-seeded rice

Shreya Kumari; Aditi Tayade; Deepti Varsha; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The present study explores a novel seed-coating approach employing cyanobacterial formulations to enhance germination and seedling vigour in direct-seeded rice (DSR), as a sustainable alternative to traditional puddled transplanting. Beneficial cyanobacterial cultures and biofilms, namely Anabaena laxa (RPAN8), Anabaena torulosa-Trichoderma viride (An-Tr), and a consortium of Anabaena torulosa , Nostoc carneum , Nostoc piscinale and Anabaena doliolum (BF1-4); were used to coat seeds of Pusa Basmati 1509 . The coatings combined carriers (vermiculite [V] and paddy straw compost: vermiculite [PV]), sticking agents (carboxymethyl cellulose [CMC] and gum arabic [GA]) and ferrous sulphate (FeSO 4 ) as iron supplement, addressing the frequent iron deficiency in DSR systems. Initial screening of 81 coating combinations identified RPAN8 + PV + 1% CMC + 1% FeSO 4 as the best formulation, exhibiting the highest percent germination and seedling-vigour indices. A subsequent plug-tray experiment compared selected coatings with hydropriming and microbial drenching. Treatments were assessed for germination, shoot and root growth, chlorophyll content, ferric chelate reductase (FCR) activity, dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and other biochemical parameters. CMC-coated seeds delivered superior biomass accumulation and seedling vigour (8–10% increment), whereas GA-based treatments enhanced root FCR and DHA activity (10–15% increment). Soil analyses revealed that GA + PV + FeSO 4 achieved a five-fold increase in DHA compared to control. Principal-component analysis (PCA) demonstrated distinct clustering according to pigment content and microbial activity. Overall, optimized seed-coating formulations not only improved early plant performance and iron nutrition, but also outperformed hydropriming and drenching. These findings indicate that cyanobacterial seed coatings offer a promising, scalable and farmer-friendly strategy to boost rice productivity under DSR conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Screening of 81 coating combinations identified RPAN8 + PV + 1% CMC + 1% FeSO4 as the best formulation, with the highest percent germination and seedling-vigour indices.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
RPAN8 + PV + 1% CMC + 1% FeSO 4e0
Interactor
Anabaena laxa (RPAN8)Anabaena laxae1other
Outcome
percent germination and seedling-vigour indicese0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
81 coating combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Initial screening of 81 coating combinations identified RPAN8 + PV + 1% CMC + 1% FeSO 4 as the best formulation, exhibiting the highest percent germination and seedling-vigour indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anabaena laxa (RPAN8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC-coated seeds gave superior biomass accumulation and seedling vigour, an 8-10% increment.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
CMC-coated seedse0
Outcome
biomass accumulation and seedling vigoure0
Direction
superiore0
Value
8–10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CMC-coated seeds delivered superior biomass accumulation and seedling vigour (8–10% increment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA-based treatments enhanced root FCR and DHA activity by 10-15%.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
GA-based treatmentse0
Outcome
FCR and DHA activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
10–15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“GA-based treatments enhanced root FCR and DHA activity (10–15% increment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA + PV + FeSO4 gave a five-fold increase in soil DHA compared with control.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
GA + PV + FeSO 4e0
Outcome
DHAe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
five-folde0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil analyses revealed that GA + PV + FeSO 4 achieved a five-fold increase in DHA compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA showed distinct clustering according to pigment content and microbial activity.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Outcome
distinct clustering according to pigment content and microbial activitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Principal-component analysis (PCA) demonstrated distinct clustering according to pigment content and microbial activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized seed-coating formulations improved early plant performance and iron nutrition.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
optimized seed-coating formulationse0
Outcome
early plant performance and iron nutritione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“optimized seed-coating formulations not only improved early plant performance and iron nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized seed-coating formulations outperformed hydropriming and drenching.

Taxon
direct-seeded ricet0
Treatment
optimized seed-coating formulationse0
Outcome
outperformed hydropriming and drenchinge0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
hydropriming and drenchinge0

Verbatim

e0

“optimized seed-coating formulations not only improved early plant performance and iron nutrition, but also outperformed hydropriming and drenching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1669–1815 · show in text ↑
t0

“direct-seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–123 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Gibberellic acid · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.